1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Gekata [30.6K]
3 years ago
5

de acuerdo con el texto leído explica porque el lavado de manos con agua y jabón es mas efectivo que el alcohol

History
1 answer:
monitta3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

to kill certain types of microbes, such as Cryptosporidium, norovirus, and Clostridium difficile 1-5. While alcohol-based hand sanitizers can inactivate many types of microbes very effectively when used correctly, 1-15 people may not use enough of the disinfectant, or may remove the product before they drying is complete 14.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
What was the progressive movement a response to?
Crank
( a ) european imperialism and american expansionism overseas
4 0
3 years ago
In the 1990s, the Russian people lost confidence in the value of the ruble, and many were no longer willing to sell goods and se
AnnyKZ [126]
The answer would be acceptability.
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of the following events were considered the most deadly terrorist attacks of the 1990s?
BaLLatris [955]

Answer:

The attack on the World Trade Center.

On ‎February 26, 1993, 6 people died, but hundreds of others were injured and sent to the hospital in critical conditions.

8 0
2 years ago
Plz answer these two questions
topjm [15]
After the Cold War ended, promoting the international spread of democracy seemed poised to replace containment as the guiding principle of U.S. foreign policy. Scholars, policymakers, and commentators embraced the idea that democratization could become America's next mission. In recent years, however, critics have argued that spreading democracy may be unwise or even harmful. This paper addresses this debate. It argues that the United States should promote democracy and refutes some of the most important arguments against U.S. efforts to spread democracy. After a brief discussion of definitions of democracy and liberalism, the paper summarizes the reasons why the spread of democracy— especially liberal democracy— benefits the citizens of new democracies, promotes international peace, and serves U.S. interests. Because the case for democratization is rarely made comprehensively, the paper explicates the arguments for why democracy promotes liberty, prevents famines, and fosters economic development. The logic and evidence of a democratic peace are also summarized, as are the ways in which U.S. security and economic interests would be advanced in a world of democracies. These benefits to U.S. interests include a reduction in threats to the United States, fewer refugees attempting to enter the United States, and better economic partners for American trade and investment. The paper then turns to a rebuttal of four prominent recent arguments against the benefits of spreading democracy: (1) the claim that the democratic peace is a myth; (2) the argument that the process of democratization increases the risk of war; (3) arguments that democratic elections are harmful in societies that are not fully liberal; and (4) claims that "Asian values" can undergird polities based on "soft authoritarianism" that are superior to liberal democracies. The paper argues that these recent critiques of U.S. efforts to promote democracy have not presented a convincing case that spreading democracy is a bad idea. The internationa spread of democracy will offer many benefits to new democracies and to the United States. The democratic peace proposition appears robust, even if scholars need to continue to develop multiple explanations for why democracies rarely, if ever, go to war. The evidence on whether democratization increases the risk of war is mixed, at best, and policies can be crafted to minimize any risks of conflict in these cases. The problem of "illiberal democracy" has been exaggerated; democratic elections usually do more good than harm. The United States should, however, aim to promote liberal values as well as electoral democracy. And the "soft authoritarian" challenge to liberal democracy was not persuasive, even before the Asian economic turmoil of 1997 and 1998 undermined claims for the superiority of "Asian values." These are one of the reasons why they should promote democracy aboard
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
5. The British taxes contributed to the colonist's disdain for Britain<br> because-
kobusy [5.1K]

Answer:

Explanation:

- Under huge pressure to curb spending, the British king and government believed that any further attempts to tax the homeland would fail. They thus seized upon other sources of income, one of which was taxing the American colonists in order to pay for the army protecting them.

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How many countries are in Western Europe <br><br> A) 15<br> B)20<br> C)25<br> D)32
    5·1 answer
  • How are modern pandemics different from the pandemics of the past?
    5·2 answers
  • What does lacrosse have in commons with stickball
    7·1 answer
  • Which kind of clause modifies nouns or pronouns?
    10·1 answer
  • Which action did President Franklin D.
    13·1 answer
  • How did women participate in Latin American Revolutions?
    12·1 answer
  • Why was the discovery of large amounts of coal a cause of the Industrial Revolution?
    13·1 answer
  • I need help giveing brainlist
    6·1 answer
  • Please help me out. I would greatly appreciate it!
    9·1 answer
  • How does our government get a count of the number of people living in an area?
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!