1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
xxTIMURxx [149]
4 years ago
12

How does God respond to the Israelites encounter with the Amalekites at Rephidum?

History
1 answer:
Sholpan [36]4 years ago
5 0
During the Exodus, when Moses and the Israelites crossed the Gulf of Aqaba and entered the land of Midian, they were met, at a place called Rephidim, by an army of Amalekites. The Bible recounts the events that took place:

Now Amalek came and fought with Israel in Rephidim. And Moses said to Joshua, "Choose us some men and go out, fight with Amalek. Tomorrow I will stand on the top of the hill with the rod of God in my hand." So Joshua did as Moses said to him, and fought with Amalek. And Moses, Aaron, and Hur went up to the top of the hill. And so it was, when Moses held up his hand, that Israel prevailed; and when he let down his hand, Amalek prevailed. But Moses' hands be came heavy; so they took a stone and put it under him, and he sat on it. And Aaron and Hur supported his hands, one on one side, and the other on the other side; and his hands were steady until the going down of the sun. So Joshua defeated Amalek and his people with the edge of the sword. -- Exodus 17:8-13, NKJV.

Just who were these Amalekites, and where did they come from? And what was to be their ultimate place in history?

Origins of Amalek

The Bible dictionary, Insight on the Scriptures, states that Amalek was a "son of Esau's first born Eliphaz, by his concubine Timna. (Ge. 36:12, 16) Amalek, a grandson of Esau, was one of the sheiks of Edom. (Ge. 36:15, 16) Amalek's name also designated his tribal descendants. -- De. 25:17; Jg. 7:12; 1 Sa. 15:2" (Watchtower Bible & Tract Society of New York, Inc. 1988. p. 86.)

While it is true Amalek's name designated his tribal descendants, there is a belief that Amalek dates back BEYOND the time of Esau; and this is backed up by the account of Chedorlaomer and the kings in Genesis 14:

In the fourteenth year Chadorlaomer and the kings that were with him came and attacked the Rephaim in Ashteroth Karnaim, the Zuzim in Ham, the Emim in Shaveh Kiriathaim, and the Horites in their mountain of Seir, as far as El Paran, which is by the wilderness.

Then they turned back and carne to En Mishpat (that is, Kadesh), and ATTACKED ALL THE COUNTRIES OF THE AMALEKITES, and also the Amorites who dwelt in Hazezon Tamar. -- Verse
You might be interested in
What laws did Jefferson refer to when he listed the complaints against the british king
sleet_krkn [62]

Answer:

The Slavery Abolition Act 1833

Explanation

Jefferson had a controversial stand on slavery. Despite being a pro-union man, he's known to own more than 500 slaves. Making the public questioned what's his true stance on slavery.   But on the public platform, he stated that  He promise that all men (both right and black) a set of unalienable rights that consist the right of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.

The Slavery Abolition Act 1833 banned slavery in all of British Territory. This act disturbed Jefferson's business considering the large part of his labor force used slaves.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
After the stalemate on the Western Front what major battle did the U.S. and French
iogann1982 [59]

Answer:

.m

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
The assassination of _________ was one of the triggers for World War I.
icang [17]
A. The death of the archduke.
5 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Will mark as the brainliest!
lorasvet [3.4K]

Answer:

The last one i think

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
A violent incident occurred in India on April 13, 1919. It involved a British military commander ordering his forces to open fir
MissTica

A violent incident occurred in India on April 13, 1919. It involved a British military commander ordering his forces to open fire on peaceful protesters. This incident sparked an international outrage. The incident was called the Amritsar Massacre.

The Amritsar massacre was a massacre in the city of Amritsar on April 13, 1919, when soldiers of the British Indian Army commanded by General Reginald Dyer machine-gunned a crowd of thousands of unarmed Sikhs, Hindus and Muslims people, who were gathered in the Jallianwala garden for the Vaisakhi festival.

The massacre permanently marked the relations between India and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland, being historically the prelude to the non-cooperation movement led by Mahatma Gandhi between 1920 and 1922.

6 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Why did Parliament decide to pass four new laws in the Massachusetts colonies in 1774
    10·2 answers
  • Is there any way lack of rain might strain English relations with the powhatans?
    7·1 answer
  • How did American desire to take Native American land contribute to
    10·1 answer
  • The formation of the United Nations was a response to
    5·2 answers
  • What does Thomas Malthus say about food supply and population control?
    14·2 answers
  • What was Cibola and what role did it play in the early Spanish exploration of Texas?
    11·1 answer
  • The interior plains of the United States include the _____ and the _____<br><br> 15 POINTSS
    5·1 answer
  • The map above supports the conclusion that the partition of India resulted in:
    7·1 answer
  • Match each term with the phrase that best defines it.
    8·1 answer
  • Compare the family roles of men and women in colonial times to those of today.
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!