Answer:
The answer is below
Explanation:
The Yuan dynasty in China which lasted between 1271 to 1368 and was established by the Mongol Legend Kublai Khan was widely popular. During the period of the dynasty, the rule was believed to have both advantage and disadvantage, one of which is the following
Pros:
The then existing government was reformed and designed to put the Mongols at the top of every socioeconomic and political top post.
Cons: Mongols gradually lost their nomadic nature, became weak, and slowly formed into the Chinese without an obvious trace, thereby ending the empire
Answer:1. pharaohs led Eyptian society. Artisans made necessary goods. The bureaucracy supported the pharaoh and ran the government.
2. The methods of embalming, or treating the dead body, that the ancient Egyptians used is called mummification. ... About 2600 B.C., during the Fourth and Fifth Dynasties, Egyptians probably began to mummify the dead intentionally. The practice continued and developed for well over 2,000 years, into the Roman Period
Explanation:
The best answer is C
The plan to attack France first was a plan by the German Chief of General Staff, Alfred Von Schlieffen which he came up with way back in 1905.
He decided that France was the enemy to be defeated first, with Russia held off until the French were annihilated. He worked out a detailed time timetable that took into account possible French responses to German actions. He believed that Germany would defeat France within six weeks, then after that he would turn his full force on Russia.
Schlieffen plan was heavily modified by his successor Moltke, thus during the outbreak of WWI in 1914, it was not implemented as Schlieffen had envisioned.
The best answer would be D.
The debate over whether a bill of rights should be added to the Constitution or not, started from some delegates' beliefs that guarantees of certain basic rights were missing from the ratified Constitution. They wanted some amendments to be included, in order to secure those liberties to the citizens.
The Federalists (those who supported the ratification of the Constitution) argued that the Constitution did not need a bill of rights because the people and the states kept any powers not given to the federal gonvernmnet. Alexander Hamilton, for example, argued that because the proposed federal government would possess only specifically assigned limited powers, ir could not threaten the fundamental liberties of the people. Anti-Federalists, however, held that a bill of rights was necessary to safeguard individual liberty and the power of the states.
Answer:
United front, armed struggle and Party building.
Explanation:
