1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
kirill [66]
3 years ago
6

What did sitting bull have to do with the battle of wounded knee?

History
1 answer:
ANTONII [103]3 years ago
4 0
He was the leader of the Sioux who defeated Gen. Custer at Wounded Knee
You might be interested in
Which statements explain why independent city-states emerged in ancient Greece?
ki77a [65]
One thing was that Seas were sometimes difficult to navigate which limited communication - D. this was already a factor which limited the possibility of one united Greece emergin because it made it very difficult to talk to these isolated islands that couldbe found through the difficult-to-navigate seas.

Another thing was that C - some city-states were located on isolated islands. 
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
List the 3 major portions of the axial skeleton.
skelet666 [1.2K]
Spine, cranium and rib cage.
7 0
3 years ago
Why did Braines write this article
olga55 [171]

Answer:

He wrote the article because political agenda, factory owners funded him

Explanation:

hope this helps! :)

3 0
2 years ago
How was the government of the han dynasty different from that of the qin dynasty?
lesya692 [45]
Although the Emperor was considered powerful by the Han and Qin Dynasty, the Han's governance was distinct from the Qin's. Whereas the Qin dynasity was ruthless in its governance, the Han Dynasity adopted a moderate governance that was aimed at uniting the people. In fact peasants, despite their low social class were treated better by the Han Dynasity unlike the Qin Dynasty. Also, whereas the Qin government controlled all the state resources, the Han government strived to achieve a balance between the local and central government
8 0
3 years ago
India will fall back quite rapidly through the centuries into the barbarism and privations of the Middle Ages. Winston Churchill
Ivan

Answer: India would not be able to govern itself in the modern world without the British.

Explanation:

The British ruled India for the better part of a century and during that time, India was their most populated and important colony and they made sure to rule it as actively as they could which is why when the Indians began demanding independence, there were some that did not approve.

Winston Churchill was one of those. He believed that if the British were to stop governing India, it would go back to a state of barbarism and anarchy. The British people who thought like him therefore believed that British rule in India was necessary for it to remain stable as India could not govern itself.

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What did the mexican government do in the 1820s in order to "civilize" the region of mexico we now know as texas?
    7·2 answers
  • Which two countries were in conflict because they both tried to settle in the Upper Ohio River Valley?
    11·1 answer
  • Which diagram most accurately illustrates the Japanese feudal system that existed between 1000 and 1600?
    7·2 answers
  • The electoral college was originally established in order to
    6·1 answer
  • Why do you think Bush listed the United Nations before the United States when naming who stood against Hussein ?
    13·2 answers
  • Which potential use of drones has many Americans alarmed?
    11·2 answers
  • What two countries does the Korean peninsula border?
    12·1 answer
  • How did the Clermont and the Erie Canal help unite the country?
    7·1 answer
  • What was the topic in the works of the “Lost Generation” of writers? I need a short answer for this question pls 10 points No Li
    14·2 answers
  • Pls help with this.<br>​
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!