Answer:
No government:
Martial law: Army in charge, everything run by the military.
House of Burgesses: The first representative assembly. The people vote for someone, the person represents them.
Explanation:
Feel free to summarize/condense all of this.
The Whigs faced a different scenario. The victory of James K. Polk (Democrat) over Henry Clay (Whig) in the 1844 presidential election had caught the southern Whigs by surprise. The key element of this defeat, which carried over into the congressional and local races in 1845 and 1846 throughout the South, was the party's failure to take a strong stand favoring Texas annexation. Southern Whigs were reluctant to repeat their mistakes on Texas, but, at the same time, Whigs from both sections realized that victory and territorial acquisition would again bring out the issue of slavery and the territories. In the South in particular, there was already the realization, or perhaps fear, that the old economic issues that had defined the Second Party System<span> were already dead. Their political goal was to avoid any sectional debate over slavery which would expose the sectional divisions within the party.</span>After an earlier attempt to acquire Texas by treaty had failed to receive the necessary two-thirds approval of the Senate, the United States annexed the Republic of Texas by a joint resolution of Congress that required simply a majority vote in each house of Congress. President John Tyler signed the bill on March 1, 1845, a few days before his term ended. As many expected, the annexation led to war with Mexico. After the capture of New Mexico and California in the first phases of the war, the political focus shifted to how much territory would be acquired from Mexico. The key to this was the determination of the future status of slavery in any new territory.
Both major political parties had labored long to keep divisive slavery issues out of national politics. The Democrats had generally been successful in portraying those within their party attempting to push a purely sectional issue as extremists that were well outside the normal scope of traditional politics.[2] However, midway through Polk's term, Democratic dissatisfaction with the administration was growing within the Martin Van Buren, or Barnburner, wing of the Democratic Party over other issues. Many felt that Van Buren had been unfairly denied the party's nomination in 1844 when southern delegates resurrected a convention rule, last used in 1832, requiring that the nominee had to receive two-thirds of the delegate votes. Many in the North were also upset with the Walker tariff which reduced the tariff rates; others were opposed to Polk's veto of a popular river and harbor improvements bill, and still others were upset over the Oregon settlement with Great Britain where it appeared that Polk did not pursue the northern territory with the same vigor he used to acquire Texas. Polk was seen more and more as enforcing strict party loyalty primarily to serve southern interests. Hope This Helps! Can I have Brainliest? Please:)
You don't owe anything in federal income taxes. Federal income taxes were declared unconstitutional by the supreme court in 1895 and the decision stood until the 16th amendment in 1913 when they were declared constitutional and mandatory again.
During those years, the US didn't receive any money at all from it's citizens and because of this the US reserve started to decrease.
If you would owe them, however, they would be paid directly to the US Federal Government.
Based on the historical account, the person that received the right to land grants in Texas as a result of the State Colonization Law of 1825 is Stephen F. Austin.
- This is evident in the fact that Stephen F. Austin got the recognition of the empresario grant from the then independent state of Mexico.
- He is also known to have taken about 300 families to settle in Texas.
- Though, Stephen Austin's father' Moses Austin had received the land grant to settle in Texas in 1820.
However, it was until after the State Colonization Law of 1825, that Stephen Austin received the land grant and finally settle there along with some other Anglo families.
Hence, in this case, the correct answer is option D. "Stephen F. Austin."
Learn more here: brainly.com/question/20065024
The Kansas-Nebraska Act was passed by the U.S. Congress on May 30, 1854. It allowed people in the territories of Kansas and Nebraska to decide for themselves whether or not to allow slavery within their borders. The Act served to repeal the Missouri Compromise of 1820 which prohibited slavery north of latitude 36°30´.
