Why is the South’s reasoning for secession flawed according to President Lincoln?

History

1 answer:

yaroslaw [1]2 years ago

6 0

Answer:

Secession would destroy the only democracy in existence and prove for all time - to both future Americans and the world - that a government of the people could not survive." Abraham Lincoln This Harper's Weekly illustration features members of the South Carolina delegation who resigned their seats on Christmas Eve 1860.

Explanation:

Because Lincoln embodied the striving for human freedom more than any figure in history. As far as Lincoln was concerned, secession was unconstitutional, and therefore the rebel states had never actually left the union. Why did the South have the right to secede?

Secession, as it applies to the outbreak of the American Civil War, comprises the series of events that began on December 20, 1860, and extended through June 8 of the next year when eleven states in the Lower and Upper South severed their ties with the Union. What did the Confederates stand for? Confederate States of America.

You might be interested in

Please help I asked so many times and no has helped. no trolls pleaseeee. please just be generous, someone :( I will give 20 pts

ddd [48]

Answer:

Early pharaohs had helped conquer enemies and ruled over Egyptian lands.

I hope this helps

4 0

3 years ago

Use the information from the analysis and develop a weather report. You can develop a flyer or make a presentation, or script. I

eduard

Explanation:

use the information from the analysis and developer weather report. you can develop a flyer or make a presentation script include which temperature during the week is the coolest 20 degree explain how you decided this using absolute value fleetop next paragraph which temperature during the week is for the from explain how you decide this using absolute value thank you for letting me please mark me as a brand list

8 0

2 years ago

One of the most controversial turning points in history was the decision made by U.S president Harry S. Thurman to use atomic we

irina [24]

Dropping the bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki were not a military necessity because from other reports, the Japanese were about to surrender anyway. It was justifiable because we were scared and we acted because we were threatened.

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Two arguments about a historical event contradict each other. How should historians determine which argument is superior? A. Pol

Oksanka [162]

The answer would be C. Search for additional evidence to see which argument supports.

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Identify military leaders who fought for

aliina [53]

Answer:

Patriots,” as they came to be known, were members of the 13 British colonies who rebelled against British control during the American Revolution, supporting instead the U.S. Continental Congress.

3 0

3 years ago