Answer:
i think it earned them money for whatever they were selling but to make the commercial its takes money so it might have taken money away from thoses other jobs and achevment otherwise it might have brought jobs to italy
Explanation:
hope this answers your question! ^_^
Answer
Trade in much of Europe declined after the fall of Rome, and towns and cities declined in size, roads were not safe, and feudal manors were an important and self-sufficient unit. Urban life remained active in the east, where cities grew especially with the rise of Islam, when Muslim societies—though not unified in a single empire—spread from the borders of China to the Iberian
Explanation:
The Crusades did not mark the beginning of trade between Muslim and Christian lands in Europe. Italian merchants traded across the Mediterranean with Constantinople, Syria and Egypt, and Spanish Muslims and Christians traded actively and produced fine goods for sale. Sicily, under Muslim rule and then under Norman rule, was a source of contact and production of goods. Among the most precious articles of trade were metal wares, silk textiles, and glass, as well as some food stuffs, dyes and perfumes.
The contribution of the Crusades was that trade increased as Europeans traveled and became more familiar with exotic goods. Increased contact and trade was part of the reason for the rise of towns and cities in western Europe, starting in Italy.
The Missouri Compromise act was an attempt by the U.S. to balance Congressional power between slave states and free states, as slaveholding states felt their representation was in danger of becoming outnumbered.
When Missouri tried to enter the Union in 1818, it threatened the tight balance of the existing 11 slave and 11 free states, which was crucial in keeping representation balanced in the Senate.
The growing abolitionist movement pereceived this tension as a good chance for proposing an amendment that banned slavery within the territory of Missouri and push forward gradual emancipation.
Hope this helps!
Answer:
The North had advantages of a larger population, more industry, more abundant resources, and a better banking system that raised money than the South to support the Civil War effort. The North also had more ships and a larger and much more efficient railroad network than the South.
Munn V. Illinois allowed the government more access to and the ability to regulate to private business.