Explanation:
Human society is continuously shaped by social, political, and technological developments. Some societies reject these developments and others embrace them. Normally, the rejection or acceptance is silent and smooth. At times, however, the process is violent and leads to conflict or revolution. According to Samuel Huntington, “a revolution is a rapid, fundamental, and violent domestic change in the dominant values and myths of a society, in its institutions, social structure, leadership, and government activity and policies.”[1] The Russian revolutions of 1905 and 1917 were marred by ardent violence and political maneuvering. This article will analyze both revolutions, illustrating that the revolution of 1905 was both a precursor and cause of the 1917 revolution, while having its own precursors and causes.
Aided by brutal defeats and unprecedented loss of life in two wars, the Russian revolutions of 1905 and 1917 were the collective backlash of the masses against the corrupt, incompetent, and uncaring autocracy of the Tsarist Regime which was unable and unwilling to change with the times. Moreover, the revolutions hardly yielded the type of productive and egalitarian change that masses called for. Thus, these revolutions serve as a cautionary tale for both governments and revolutionaries.
Answer:
he had the votes from the electoral college
Explanation:
Well, the king of England back then had many things that the colonies did not like about him. For one the king had taken the rights from the nobility. He also raised the taxes on the colonies to pay for his wars. Lastly, he had restricted voting rights from the colonies.
I hope this helps you. Have a great day!!!!!!!!
Answer: The answer should be A- Increased jobs and lower prices.
Explanation:
A. whether or not Missouri should let women vote B. whether or not Missouri should let African
