1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
kumpel [21]
3 years ago
6

What do the following words mean?

English
1 answer:
faust18 [17]3 years ago
3 0
Profaner (from my experiences) means irreligious or a heathen ect.
You might be interested in
As fewer people watch television, income from advertising declines; as a result, the networks have turned to new sources of reve
Svetradugi [14.3K]

Answer:

fewer, new, and pay-per-view

Explanation:

fewer describes people, new describes source, and pay-per-view is for basis

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Identify adjective phrase and the word it modifies in this sentence "Roman roads were one reason for Caesar's military success.
liberstina [14]
Roman roads is an adjective phrase. Roman is an adjective that expresses nationality and modifies roads
Military success is an adjective phrase. Military is modifying success.
7 0
3 years ago
Should religious belief influence law,five paragraph argument.
konstantin123 [22]

Explanation:

Whatever we make of the substance of Judge Andrew Rutherford's ruling in the Cornish private hotel case, his citation of a striking and controversial opinion by Lord Justice Laws – delivered in another religious freedom case in 2010 – is worth pausing over. The owners of the Chymorvah hotel were found to have discriminated against a gay couple by refusing them a double-bedded room. They had appealed to their right to manifest their religious belief by running their hotel according to Christian moral standards. Given the drift of recent legal judgments in cases where equality rights are thought to clash with religious freedom rights, it is no surprise that the gay couple won their case.

But quite apart from the merits of the case, judges should be warned off any future reliance on the ill-considered opinions about law and religion ventured last year by Lord Justice Laws. Laws rightly asserted that no law can justify itself purely on the basis of the authority of any religion or belief system: "The precepts of any one religion – any belief system – cannot, by force of their religious origins, sound any louder in the general law than the precepts of any other."

A sound basis for this view is Locke's terse principle, in his Letter on Toleration, that "neither the right nor the art of ruling does necessarily carry with it the certain knowledge of other things; and least of all the true religion".

But Laws seemed to ground the principle instead on two problematic and potentially discriminatory claims. One is that the state can only justify a law on the grounds that it can be seen rationally and objectively to advance the general good (I paraphrase). The question is, seen by whom? What counts as rational, objective and publicly beneficial is not at all self-evident but deeply contested, determined in the cut and thrust of democratic debate and certainly not by the subjective views of individual judges. Religiously inspired political views – such as those driving the US civil rights movement of the 1960s or the Burmese Buddhists today – have as much right to enter that contest as any others. In this sense law can quite legitimately be influenced by religion.

Laws' other claim is that religious belief is, for all except the holder, "incommunicable by any kind of proof or evidence", and that the truth of it "lies only in the heart of the believer". But many non-Christians, for example, recognise that at least some of the claims of Christianity – historical ones, no doubt, or claims about universal moral values – are capable of successful communication to and critical assessment by others. Laws' assertion is also inconsistent with his own Anglican tradition, in which authority has never been seen as based on the subjective opinions of the individual but rather on the claims of "scripture, tradition and reason" acting in concert.

6 0
3 years ago
In what ways can reading, writing, or talking about feeling different help someone who is struggling with that emotion?
ASHA 777 [7]

Talking about your feelings can help you stay in good mental health and deal with times when you feel troubled. ... It's part of taking charge of your wellbeing and doing what you can to stay healthy. Talking can be a way to cope with a problem you've been carrying around in your head for a while.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Can someone help me start this essay?
erma4kov [3.2K]

My thoughts on the economic, political, and racial environment in the mid-1930s American South helped by how to kill a Mockingbird are........

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which words in the sentence make up the appositive phrase? Mrs. Guerrero, the president of the historical society, is retiring n
    9·1 answer
  • Please help and thanks :)
    12·2 answers
  • Write at least 1 paragraph about your fav things to do
    11·1 answer
  • A claim is a debatable statement.<br> False<br> True
    6·2 answers
  • Which best states the author's purpose in writing the paragraph?
    15·1 answer
  • write an article for a school magazine called " who needs fireworks" ? Engage with some of the ideas and use some of the facts i
    10·1 answer
  • Which question is not answered in the article?
    12·1 answer
  • What is noun and pronoun?? <br>Please need ko po ​
    11·2 answers
  • Help please due today !!!! 20 points!!
    5·2 answers
  • China has become a global financial power. For evidence, look no farther than the Shanghai Tower. When finished, it will stand 2
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!