Answer:
Retroactive interference
Explanation:
Retroactive Interference: The retroactive interference refers to the process when a particular piece of information being similar in the format of the information that an individual wants to recall.
In other words, the term retroactive interference refers to the process when a recent information hinders in the recall of the older information.
Example: A boy calls his ex-girlfriend by his current girlfriend's name.
In the question above, Jessica's problem is most likely due to the retroactive interference.
Answer:
It's important to understand and fight horizontal oppression because:
<u>A vulnerable group mustn't attack between himself, they must look for equal opportunities and a better life level, the reason why everyone must stop this type of oppression</u>.
Explanation:
The horizontal oppression is the action where members from the same vulnerable group attack other members by reasons like different thoughts, conflicts of interests, or prejudices. How this behavior doesn't benefit the people in that group, in change, further affects them, the best action, in that case, is to stop immediately this action and make the aggressor see his mistake, <em>an example can see where an afro-descendant harass another member of this population because be weak</em>.
Answer: Storming
Explanation:
Storming is defined as the level in group/team development in which sorting between members takes place by raising their opinions and thoughts openly for gaining each other trust.
In this situation, sometimes conflict may rise due to the position, status and power of other members.Also members become interested in learning different opinions than having common opinion which creates trust in team members knowing about everyone's actual thoughts.
According to the situation mentioned int he question, Nick's team is facing storming stage in the rems of group development. Terek , member of the team is not agreeing with direction given by Nick because their opinions does not match and thus, its creating a dispute.
Answer:
Alcohol withdrawal syndrome
Explanation:
The question actually tells us that Heather is having physical withdrawal symptoms after she stopped drinking.
In particular, Alcohol withdrawal syndrome includes various symptoms such like <u>headache, nausea, vomiting, insomnia, shaking hands, trembling and sweating.</u> As time passes <u>hallucinations</u> can also happen (after 24 hours) and the symptoms can continue getting worse: between 48 to 72 hours, <u>delirium tremens </u>can take place (this refers to vivid hallucinations) but it can also include heavy sweating and a rapid heart beat.
We can see that the symptoms Heather has after 24 hours without having alcohol are some from the alcohol withdrawal syndrome (trembling, vivid dreams, sweating, rapid heart rate, nausea, among others).
In some research, the researchers are not able to use random assignments to divide participants among groups. Instead, they compare preexisting groups, which results in a quasi-experimental design.
Random assignments are those which are given as a matter of chance to ensure fairness and equal opportunity for all participants. Here participants forming multiple groups are with similar characteristics. So all groups are the same at the start of the experiment.
A quasi-experimental design applies a non-random method, and subjects are assigned to preexisting groups. There are some situations where true experiments can't be used for practical reasons. In such cases, a quasi-experimental design is a suitable tool.
To learn more about quasi experimental design here
brainly.com/question/28145500
#SPJ4
