Yes I think that each side has good things to say about the other side. This is because I think that many people's political viewpoints don't always perfectly align to one party or the other. In reality, life is much more complicated than picking one side. Sure some people might agree with policies from the Democrat's side, but they might see other Republican views to be valid as well. I like to think of it as a buffet of ideas, where people tend to pick and choose which talking points they magnetically snap to. We could have for example a socially liberal person but who supports conservative financial measures; or we could have someone who has very religious conservative morals, but supports liberal monetary policies.
In other words, it's unrealistic to assume people will be purely one party. Those who seem that way tend to be stuck in a bubble where it's like a feedback loop of talking points fed to them. Fox News is one example of this on the conservative side, while MSNBC is an example of this on the liberal side. Those stuck in this bubble would likely not have much nice things to say about the other side, if they have anything nice to say at all. However, I think to some (if not many) people, politics has become very toxic that they simply turn the tv off entirely. By "turn off", I mean literally turn it off or change the channel to something else. These people I'd consider somewhere in the middle in a moderate range. Furthermore, these moderates are likely to have some nice things to say about both sides, but they might have their complaints about both sides as well.
In short, if you pick someone from either extreme, then it's likely they'll have nothing nice to say about the other side. If you pick someone from the middle, then they might have nice things to say about both sides. It all depends who you ask. Also, it depends on how politically active they are.
Children were viewed as noble savages with an intrinsic plan for orderly, healthy growth by the French philosopher Jean-Jacques Rousseau in the 18th century. Stage and maturation are ideas that are part of Rousseau's philosophy.
A fictionalized representation of an uncivilized man, the noble savage represents the inherent goodness of a person who has not been subjected to civilization's corrupting forces.
A recurring motif in Romantic literature from the 18th and 19th centuries, particularly in Jean-Jacques Rousseau's writings, is the exaltation of the noble barbarian. For instance, Émile, ou, De l' education, 4 vol. (1762), is a lengthy essay on the corrupting effects of conventional education; Confessions (written in 1765–1770), an autobiography, affirms the fundamental idea of human goodness; and Dreams of noble savages a Solitary Walker (written in 1777–1778), a book of nature descriptions and man's natural reaction to them, are both found in Dreams of a Solitary Walker.
Learn more about noble savage here
brainly.com/question/1611606
#SPJ4
Answer:
Burgoyne marched into New York from Canada
Explanation:
Answer:
<h2>
y=11 </h2><h2>y=1</h2><h2>y=-9</h2><h2>y=-19</h2>
Explanation:
According to PEMDAS we start with the parenthesis, so when we change x to the given value for x, we first multiply that by -5, then we add 1 to the answer.
