Pretexting <span>occurs when someone deceives by pretending to be someone else
People who do this often to pretend to be someone that they deeply admire in order to gain acceptance from a certain individual or social group.
For example: Someone who pretended to love a certain type of music in order to be able to hang out with a group that love that music</span>
Full Question:
Jane operates a home decorations shop selling slightly used goods. She bought a painting from Sally for the shop. Bob came into the shop and asked if the painting was by Bill, a local artist of some repute. Jane, without checking with Sally, says, "I'm sure it is" because she really did think it looked like one of Bill's paintings. Bob bought the painting. A week or so later, he took the painting by Bill's studio. Bill just laughed and said that he never painted anything that horrible. Bob took the painting back to Jane and asked for a refund. Jane refused on the basis that she never gave refunds and that Bob took the risk that the painting was not done by Bill. Should Bob sue in small claims court, who will likely win and why?
a. Bob, on the basis of negligent misrepresentation
b. Bob, on the basis of innocent misrepresentation.
c. Bob, on the basis of a unilateral mistake.
d. Jane, on the basis that Bob accepted the risk of loss.
e. Jane, both on the basis that Bob accepted the risk of loss and that he agreed by an oral contract to purchase the painting.
Answer:
a. Bob, on the basis of negligent misrepresentation
Explanation:
Negligent misrepresentation
occurs when someone makes a statement without making sure this statement is based on true facts. Negligent misrepresentation happens when a person may not lie directly (saying something knowing it to be untrue), but makes a statement about something with no factual backing. Bob will likely win here because Jane "assumed" the painting was from Bill without confirming it was.
It is a set of some of the first known laws. Also one of the oldest laws to be deciphered.
The correct answer is acquired apraxia. Acquired apraxia of
speech or also known AOS is a motor speech disorder by which it likely results
with one’s inability to control the muscles that is being used that is
responsible for one to form words.
Answer:
Here your answer : )
Explanation:
The law protects citizens against human right violations in the following ways:
1. Protection of Human Rights Act 1993 : declares the rights pertaining to life, equality, liberty, and dignity of an individual that is guaranteed by the Constitution of India.
2. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights UDHR declared by the United Nations General Assembly in the year 1948.
I hope this helps you.
