1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Ierofanga [76]
3 years ago
15

Safavid shahs did all of the following EXCEPT a. follow Roman laws. b. be more available to their subjects. c. seize landed esta

tes. d. appoint officials based on merit.
History
2 answers:
alukav5142 [94]3 years ago
7 0
<span>Safavid shahs claimed to be family descendants from the prophet Muhammad. They were more available to their subjects, seized landed estates and appoint</span>
Hunter-Best [27]3 years ago
5 0
Safavid shahs claimed to be family descendants from the prophet Muhammad. They were more available to their subjects, seized landed estates and appointed officials based on merit. They did not follow Roman laws. 
You might be interested in
A government in which one person takes over by force is called a government in which one person takes over by force is called
grin007 [14]

Answer:

Dictatorship is your answer.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Japan created the greater east asia co-prosperity sphere to.
VikaD [51]

Answer:

The Greater East Asia Co-Prosperity Sphere, or the GEACPS, was an imperialist concept which was developed in the Empire of Japan and propagated to Asian populations which were occupied by it from 1931 to 1945. It extended across the Asia-Pacific and promoted the cultural and economic unity of East Asians, Southeast Asians, South Asians and Oceanians. It also declared the intention to create a self-sufficient bloc of Asian nations which would be led by the Japanese and be free from the rule of Western powers. The idea was first announced on 1 August 1940 in a radio address delivered by Foreign Minister Yōsuke Matsuoka.

Explanation:

8 0
2 years ago
If there is a statement where Hobbes and Locke would disagree, explain their differences
OlgaM077 [116]

Answer:

Locke believed that we have the right to life as well as the right to just and impartial protection of our property. Any violation of the social contract would one in a state of war with his fellow countrymen. Conversely, Hobbes believed that if you simply do what you are told, you are safe Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What happened at pearl harbour
irinina [24]

Answer:

a sunimi

Explanation:

7 0
4 years ago
How did the cherokee deal with the georigia laws
VARVARA [1.3K]

Answer:sued them to stop them from taking there land on the basis that the Cherokee were a sovrine nation and because they were violating previous treys that had been sighed

Explanation:

6 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • • method of exchanging digital messages across the Internet
    10·1 answer
  • The war on the western front was a stalemate by 1916. What was the effect of this development?
    13·2 answers
  • Why do you think the Americans were concerned about protecting the northern part of North America?
    14·1 answer
  • Why were samurai drawn to Zen Buddhism ?
    8·1 answer
  • How do you think George Washington would have felt about the Monroe Doctrine? Would have have supported it or been against it?
    7·1 answer
  • Both the British and the Americans frequently used horseback riders to carry messages, and both sides tried to capture the rider
    14·2 answers
  • How did France,Spain,and England settle America differently?
    10·1 answer
  • study the following maps.how were midlle eastern politics affected as a result of the territorial change shown here
    14·1 answer
  • HELP FAST ILL GIVE BRAINLIEST!!!!!
    13·2 answers
  • What caused world war 1​
    6·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!