Well.... to start with the "Recession<span>" Tops The </span>Great Depression<span>. When the stock market crashed in October 1929, it was only the beginning of a long period of economic decline and uncertainty that would last more than a decade. ... In 2011 those few years often where described as the worst economic crisis since the </span>Great Depression. But how do the two differ in a quick answer.<span> The </span>difference<span> between the two is that the unemployment rate in "The Great R</span>ecession"<span> was less severe than in "The Great D</span><span>epression"</span>
Answer:
Isolationism is described as <u>D.internally focused foreign policy</u>
Explanation:
Isolationism is a foreign policy that believes in the government having an 'internal focus' where the government should try to improve to solve national problems before taking care of issues that are far from home.
Isolationism can be both political and economic. A isolationist political policy would mean that a country decides not to take part in world events and instead use their funds and energy internally.
An example of this can be countries like Switzerland, which do not take part in international wars and missions and only recently joined the UN.
An economic isolationist policy is when a country decides to not trade freely around the world. This might be to safeguard local natural resources or against foreign competition. There have been many examples of such countries, one of the best known being Japan in the early 15th century.
Repenting of one's sins to be saved; emotional connection
Hello. You forgot to put the text to which this question refers. The text is:
After listing the numerous powers granted to Congress by the Constitution the author says:
My object is to consider that undefined, unbounded and immense power which is comprised in the following clause: “And to make all laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into execution the foregoing powers, and all other powers vested by this constitution in the government of the United States; or in any department or offices thereof.” Under such a clause as this, can anything be said to be reserved and kept back from Congress? ...
In giving such immense, such unlimited powers, was there no necessity of a Bill of Rights, to secure to the people their liberties? Is it not evident that we are left wholly dependent on the wisdom and virtue of the men who shall from time to time be the members of Congress? And who shall be able to say seven years hence, the members of Congress will be wise and good men, or of the contrary character?
Answer:
The author uses the words "undefined", "unbounded" and "immense" to describe the powers of the constitution.
Explanation:
For the author, the constitution is highly powerful, since it has the capacity to possess immense, unlimited and indefinite power. This is a concern for the population of the country, because nothing guarantees that all this relevance will not be used for evil.
The power of the constitution is managed by those who administer it, the congressmen. No one guarantees that the members of the Congress are and will be just and good people, who will use all the power of the constitution for good.
