According to Marx’s theory of immiseration, what does capitalism eventually lead to?

1 answer:

5 0

When businesses compete everything is great. Eventually one of the businesses in a field gets bigger. And bigger. And bigger. It buys out it's competitors. It monopolizes it's niche filed, sometimes even spreading to others.Since money will no longer be used, people will have access to all of the resources they need, and there will no longer be a state to protect the capitalist's private property, I find it extremely unlikely that a worker would want to exchange his labor for a wage. The way I see it, it would be like playing pretend. The situation would be similar to if a group of people in the United States declared their friend Tim the king of Arkansas.

You might be interested in

Which of the following events was a direct consequence of the Islamic Revolution?

AURORKA [14]

Answer:

it's b

Explanation:

if not b then it's c

7 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Explain whether each event moved France closer to a representative government or further away from it and why.

11Alexandr11 [23.1K]

A IS YOUR ANSWER ................

7 0

2 years ago

Professor Takaki sees Shakespeare's play "The Tempest" as a story about the creation of a new society in America primarily becau

12345 [234]

Answer:

Explanation:

It talks about the minorities and majorities of Peopel living there.As what kindof bias or prejudice it is what we called as racism/racial prejudice.

7 0

3 years ago

Because of good transportation, __________ and __________ often develop on the plains.

Nataly [62]

Because of good transportation, ____trade and manufacturing_______ often develop on the plains.

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

HEY CAN ANYONE WRITE A PARAGRAPH EXPLAINING ABOUT ANCIENT SPORTS!

IRINA_888 [86]

Answer: Chariot racing was dangerous to both drivers and horses as they often suffered serious injury and even death, but these dangers added to the excitement and interest for spectators. Chariot races could be watched by women, who were banned from watching many other sports. In the Roman form of chariot racing, teams represented different groups of financial backers and sometimes competed for the services of particularly skilled drivers. As in modern sports like football, spectators generally chose to support a single team, identifying themselves strongly with its fortunes, and violence sometimes broke out between rival factions. The rivalries were sometimes politicized, when teams became associated with competing social or religious ideas. This helps explain why Roman and later Byzantine emperors took control of the teams and appointed many officials to oversee them.

The sport faded in importance in the West after the fall of Rome. It survived much longer in the Byzantine Empire, where the traditional Roman factions continued to play a prominent role for several centuries, gaining influence in political matters. Their rivalry culminated in the Nika riots, which marked the gradual decline of the sport.

5 0

2 years ago