Can be considered poor. Their GDP puts them in the second lowest position in the worldwide GDP rank, meaning that both their income and consumption are very low (small scale farming and textile manufacturing are also evidence of this) meaning their living conditions are sub-optimal for most of the people.
The response to the prompt about how each of the presidents responded to the First 100 days is this:
- Most of the presidents welcomed the idea of the First 100 days but some of them did not build a strong foundation within this time period. Franklin Roosevelt was one President that made good use of his first 100 days. He enacted legislation that solved economic problems but Presidents Harry Truman and Dwight Eisenhower did not start up on very strong notes.
<h3>What is the ideology of the First 100 years?</h3>
The ideology of the first 100 years stands on the fact that many institutions and the citizens of the United States observe the first three months of the President's reign to see the policies that he has put in place to make the nation work better.
Some of them did well during this period while some did not. Others started well and ended up badly while others started on a shaky note and ended up well.
Learn more about the First 100 days here:
brainly.com/question/3348172
#SPJ1
The social cognitive perspective is the research perspective emerged in the 1970s to answer the general question of what specific mental processes are involved in the person's construction of an understanding of the social world.
What is social cognitive perspective?
Social conduct is seen as a result of cognitive processes that go along with situational circumstances from a social cognitive approach. Therefore, violent behavior occurs in a social setting and is largely a result of the individual's interpretation and processing of social information.
How does cognitive perspective explain human behavior?
This strategy focuses on the impact of one's inner sentiments and beliefs on behavior. The cognitive method places an emphasis on the value of memory, perception, and attention, as well as language, judgment, and problem-solving. This method frequently makes a comparison between the human brain and a computer.
Learn more about social cognitive perspective: brainly.com/question/14368393
#SPJ4
Answer:
There should be no limits on owning and using guns.
Explanation:
The Second Amendment was added to the constitution to protect people's right to keep and bear arms and the government's right to establish a Militia for the defense of the nation. Therefore, "There should be no limits on owning and using guns" is the statement that best interprets the statute because the statute is not specific enough, it can be broadly understood that since people have the right to own arms for self-defense, they also have the right to use them when there is a threat to their security.
The amendment states: <em>A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, </em><em>the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.</em>
Are all ways that the Constitution limits government power.
^^ That feels like the most right answer, tell me if it helps any
