<span>Slave ownership in territories could be decided by popular sovereignty </span>
<span>The Articles were weak in that they left too much power to the States. Also, amending the Articles ended in failure, leading to the forming of a Constitution.</span>
It can be helpful when:
- The intervention occurs with a humanitarian purpose, as in a country that just had a couple of its cities wasted by a natural disaster, like a tsunami or tornado.
- Or in a country which its population has been suffering from hunger for decades due to political crises or coups
It can be ineffective or even destructive when:
- It's a military extreme intervention on a city or country that although on war, it's still very populated by civilians. Like it was in the War on Terror campaign, started by the US after the 9/11 terrorist assault, with American invasion on Iraq, Afghanistan, Syria, and others. It ended up being effective, with even the fall of Al-Qaeda's terrorist organization leader in 2011, but in the process several cases of violent acts against and deaths of civilians were reported.
Hi, the answer is collecting taxes under the government of the president as to the constitution which is not irreversible under a certain action by the congress that works with the legislature.
Can you review and make me brainlest?
Answer: to shape public opinion, the other one is wrong
Explanation:
