<span>While they are stunningly beautiful, they also are rich in history and meaning. Sunflowers symbolize adoration, loyalty and longevity. Much of the meaning of sunflowers stems from its namesake, the sun itself.</span>
As college sports continue to be hugely popular and the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) brings in large amounts of revenue, people have revived the debate on whether college athletes should get paid.
There are many ways payments could work. They could be in the form of a free-market approach, where athletes are able to earn whatever the market is willing to pay them, it could be a set amount of money per athlete, or student athletes could earn income from endorsements, autographs, and control of their likeness, similar to the way top Olympians earn money.
Proponents of the idea believe that, because college athletes are the ones who are training, participating in games, and bringing in audiences, they should receive some sort of compensation for their work. If there were no college athletes, the NCAA wouldn’t exist, college coaches wouldn’t receive there (sometimes very high) salaries, and brands like Nike couldn’t profit from college sports. In fact, the NCAA brings in roughly $1 billion in revenue a year, but college athletes don’t receive any of that money in the form of a paycheck. Additionally, people who believe college athletes should be paid state that paying college athletes will actually encourage them to remain in college longer and not turn pro as quickly, either by giving them a way to begin earning money in college or requiring them to sign a contract stating they’ll stay at the university for a certain number of years while making an agreed-upon salary.
Supporters of this idea point to Zion Williamson, the Duke basketball superstar, who, during his freshman year, sustained a serious knee injury. Many argued that, even if he enjoyed playing for Duke, it wasn’t worth risking another injury and ending his professional career before it even began for a program that wasn’t paying him. Williamson seems to have agreed with them and declared his eligibility for the NCAA draft later that year. If he was being paid, he may have stayed at Duke longer. In fact, roughly a third of student athletes surveyed stated that receiving a salary while in college would make them “strongly consider” remaining collegiate athletes longer before turning pro.
Paying athletes could also stop the recruitment scandals that have plagued the NCAA. In 2018, the NCAA stripped the University of Louisville's men's basketball team of its 2013 national championship title because it was discovered coaches were using sex workers to entice recruits to join the team. There have been dozens of other recruitment scandals where college athletes and recruits have been bribed with anything from having their grades changed, to getting free cars, to being straight out bribed. By paying college athletes and putting their salaries out in the open, the NCAA could end the illegal and underhanded ways some schools and coaches try to entice athletes to join.
People who argue against the idea of paying college athletes believe the practice could be disastrous for college sports. By paying athletes, they argue, they’d turn college sports into a bidding war, where only the richest schools could afford top athletes, and the majority of schools would be shut out from developing a talented team (though some argue this already happens because the best players often go to the most established college sports programs, who typically pay their coaches millions of dollars per year). It could also ruin the tight camaraderie of many college teams if players become jealous that certain teammates are making more money than they are.
Answer:
Confused but okay Ain''t yall keep the fellow's pen?
Answer:
2. C-costs a lot
3. D-Don't worry, I will order food for you.
4. A-travel
5. will work
Explanation:
- 2.<u> Word expensive means that something has a high monetary value and that it costs a lot.</u> The sentence tries to say that 3D today costs a lot so only a few people own it personally. But it implies that in the future its value will fall and it will become more common when it starts being more monetary approachable to people.
- 3. Out of all the answer options, “Don't worry, I will order food for you.” is the most logical one. <u>Because the first sentence is someone stating that they are hungry, it is logical that the second one is the person giving them the answer to their problems. In this case, that is ordering the food.</u>
- 4. The sentence uses future tense with going to structure. These sentences using this structure use form <u>subjects + CORRECT FOR OF THE VERB “BE” + GOING TO + verb in the infinitive</u>. This structure is used for the future events that we are certain about (here it is the journey to London which is probably booked in advance). The verb to be here is correctly used in the third singular person, as we see “she” is the subject – therefore the correct form will be “is”. Finally, <u>we use the infinitive of the verb “travel” and it means the verb stays the same.</u>
- 5. Correct full sentence is<u> “I think robots will work in the hospitals in the future”.</u> The form of future will is built is<u> WILL + infinitive verb</u>, therefore will stay the same, and will is added in front of it. This form is used when something is not certain when we only suggest it or think of it when it is a rapid decision or promise.
