History has shown us that Sun Yat-Sen and Yuan Shigai <u>did </u><u>not share </u><u>the same </u><u>motives </u><u>for </u><u>supporting </u><u>the provisional </u><u>government</u><u>. </u>
<h3>Sun Yat-Sen and Yuan Shigai in 1911</h3>
- Both men were very influential in calls for the end of the Qing dynasty.
- Sun Yat-Sen was a strong believer in the need for China to modernize and change its governance in other to develop.
While Sun Yat-Sen had better motives for China in mind, Yuan Shigai did not and when he took over, he became increasingly authoritarian and even tried to proclaim himself emperor.
In conclusion, they did not have the same motives.
Find out more on Sun Yat-Sen at brainly.com/question/780808.
The answers are B. C. and E.
Answer: Appeasement was the right policy for England because it gave them time to prepare and get there army together. Appeasement allowed them to have peace and no conflict for a while which is a good outcome of appeasement. Lord Halifax even promoted appeasement because it allowed them to prepare for the war which happened within a year.
Explanation: It's understandable that having peace through appeasement would put England in advantage during the war and France could focus on theirselves.
Answer: A hlbjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjhjb
Cuz, Jesus tell Moses to go to Holy Land, and its important to a cristian obey Jesus
