D................... :) .
Answer: <u>Assembling perpective</u> is a system for understanding collective behavior that credited individuals in crowds as rational beings. This theory refocuses attention from collective behavior to collective action, which is based on a shared interest.
Explanation:
Assembling perspective is briefly explained above.
The use of violence would not limit the effectiveness. It would aggravate it, actually, enough to land you in prison for a long time with no bail.
<u>Answer:
</u>
Yes, the court should grant the motion to suppress as the police had searched for and taken into custody the marijuana bricks without having a search warrant.
<u>Explanation:
</u>
- For the action carried out by the police to be deemed as lawful, the police should have a warrant issued by the magistrate.
- An operation carried out by the police in private property without a warrant is considered as a breach of rights of the individual and can be used against the police.
- Any property taken into custody by the police without a search warrant can be asked to be suppressed by the defendant.
Answer:
Inadmissible, because prior bad acts cannot be admitted to prove the defendant's propensity to commit the specific crime with which he is charged
Explanation:
Evidence
This is refered to as a group or a collective mass of things such as testimony and exhibits etc.
Trier of law helps to know what laws apply to the case, decides on what evidence is admissible, reviews written briefs submitted by both sides, gives legal points and authories relevant to the decision etc.
The role of prosecutor
They are responsible for filing of charges, trials, and appeals, review the actions of police officers, make judgements on whether they were appropriate etc.
The role of defense is responsible for trial strategy.
The evidence is admissible in court are only important evidence related to its admissible in court. In some few cases, relevant evidence will not be admitted in court.
A relevant evidence is inadmissible if it one is when the evidence found is in violation of the defendants constitutional rights or violations of the hearsay rule that state that information is opportuned.etc.
