Answer: differential susceptibility.
Explanation:
Jay Belsky´s differential susceptibility hypothesis states that some people, including infants, are further influenced, for better and for worst, by their context and developmental realities. This means that, due to personal characteristics, weather genetic, physiologic, or behavioral, some people are more prone than others to be affected by the negative outcomes of adverse environmental conditions, such as poverty and family dysfunction.
When trying to determine the hazards linked with responding to a chemical incident, you should refer to the yellow section of the erg.
Employee resource groups (ERGs) improve the physical working environment for everyone by fostering a sense of community among remote workers and underrepresented groups.
The Orange Section of the ERG contains 62 "Guides" that list the primary hazards connected to each applicable general category of hazardous material and provide essential advice on handling incidents involving that broad category of dangerous material.
The yellow-bordered pages index lists dangerous goods in the order of 4-digit numerical ID code. A corresponding guide number is given to the user that references safety information in the orange section.
The correct option choice is b) yellow.
To learn more about hazards here
brainly.com/question/28066523
#SPJ4
Answer and Explanation:
This means that a theory which leads to imposing moral standards universally without regard to people's historical and psychological differences are based off of subjectivism and lack any form of thorough investigation(normative science). This is self explanatory in the question where it says "...postulates moral truths enunciated by self-evident intuitions that are unchangeable". Moral standards such as this are mostly based on traditions that are subjective and are not given to transparency. This is opposed to when questions may be asked and investigations come into play as to why a particular moral opinion is taken enabling a society appreciate or understand a moral stance based on it's historical, cultural or psychological origins.
included the areas of Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Ohio, Minnesota, and parts of Wisconsin
