Arguments for Colonization:
- It helps the colonized countries learned about the advancement in technology that possess by the country that colonize them.
Arguments against colonization
- It create an economic stagnation in the colonized country since their reosurces were extremely exploited by the colonziation
- It create deep resentment among the target of colonziation, which lead to many violent revolution
- It turned the governemtn away form its own people. In order to colonize a country, the government of the colinized country tend to be bribed so it can pass the legislations that benefit the colonization.
I’m confused of what you are trying to ask
<span>restrictive just took the test</span>
Answer:
Locke believed that we have the right to life as well as the right to just and impartial protection of our property. Any violation of the social contract would one in a state of war with his fellow countrymen. Conversely, Hobbes believed that if you simply do what you are told, you are safe Explanation:
Answer: Very few groups in the 1960s advocated violence, except the US government, in the form of military adventure, where they went far beyond advocating. A total of about 1,353,000 deaths occurred on all sides in the Vietnam war. Then there was/is the Klu Klux Klan. We need to be watchful even now. The Weathermen were a small organization and they claimed not to intend violence, but use it if “necessary.” The Black Panthers called themselves a party of “self defense.” Whether or how often individuals in the latter two groups deviated from their charters (if any) is hard to determine.
Anyway people can justify their actions of violence it doesn't mean it was justification for everybody.
