Answer:
The correct answer is: a new law that interferes with economic efficiency.
Explanation:
A production possibilities frontier shows all the points where production is efficient. The resources are being completely employed. The points above the frontier are unattainable. The points below the frontier are attainable but inefficient.
If there is a movement from the frontier to a point below it. This means inefficient allocation of resources. It can happen because of some law interfering in efficient allocation of resources.
Income elasticity of demand measures the receptiveness of the quantity demanded for a good or service to a change in income.
It's calculated as the ratio of the percentage change in quantity demanded to the percentage change in income.
Explanation:
Hope this helps!!
Answer:
Strategic dissonance
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that the term that best illustrates the situation is Strategic dissonance. This term intents to describe the disconnect between the organization's actions from their actual intent. Which seems to be the case in this scenario as Cardwire Inc. has lowered it's prices in order to sell more and lower it's overall costs but has instead spent more on buying raw materials.
Answer:
Investment in stock C is $122450.3311 rounded off to $122450.33
Explanation:
A portfolio which is equally as risky as market should have a beta equal to the beta of the market as beta is a measure of the riskiness. The beta of market is always equal to 1. The formula for beta of a portfolio is as follows:
Portfolio beta = wA * Beta A + wB * Beta B + ... + wN * Beta N
Where w represents the weight of each stock in the portfolio.
Let investment in stock C be x
1 = 146000/500000 * 0.91 + 134000/500000 * 1.36 + x/500000 * 1.51
1 = 0.26572 + 0.36448 + 1.51x / 500000
1 - 0.6302 = 1.51x / 500000
0.3698 * 500000 = 1.51x
1844900 / 1.51 = x
x = $122450.3311 rounded off to $122450.33
