All categories

4 years ago

Macroeconomists are like scientists because they both:

Business

1 answer:

Masteriza [31]4 years ago

8 0

Answer: 1) collect data, develop hypotheses, and analyze the results.

Explanation:

Scientist are the professional who work in physical science or natural scientist field to gather information ,creates hypothesis for testing or experimentation to know about the actual outcome.

Macroeconomic is the field where overall economy is studied and analyzed to generate studied supposition .From created theory, evaluation of phenomena is done.

Other options are incorrect because unlimited usage of controlled experiment, relying on analyze data nd designing data are not the measure taken by scientist of macroeconomic field .Thus, the correct option is option (1).

You might be interested in

What limits specialization in the global economy?

abruzzese [7]

The answer is "trade barriers"

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Why should you spend a large amount of time thinking about a big decision before you make it? need asap

Liula [17]

You should spend a large amount of time thinking about a big decision before you make it because it could have a huge impact in your life. You need to be able to decide if it is the right or wrong choice or if there is any consequences.

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

The proper order of the following steps in the accounting cycle is prepare unadjusted trial balance, journalize transactions, po

photoshop1234 [79]

Answer:

The Accounting Cycle is as follows:

1. Transactions are analyzed and recorded in the journal.

2. Transactions are posted to the ledger.

3. An unadjusted trial balance is prepared.

4. Adjustment data are asssembled and analyzed.

5. An optional end-of-period spreadsheet is prepared.

6. Adjusting entries are journalized and posted to the ledger.

7. An adjusted trial balance is prepared.

8. Financial statements are prepared.

9. Closing entries are journalized and posted to the ledger.

10. A post-closing trial balance is prepared.

8 0

3 years ago

A project to build a new bridge seems to be going very well since the project is well ahead of schedule and costs seem to be run

tresset_1 [31]

Answer:

Schedule variance = $1,428,140

Schedule Performance Index (SPI) = 1.132

Cost Performance Index = 0.801

Explanation:

Planned Value = $1,414,000 + $10,494,000 + $8,494,000 * 53%

= $20,402,000 * 53%

= $10,813,060

Earned Value = $1,414,000 + $10,494,000 + $8,494,000 * 60%

= $20,402,000 * 60%

= $12,241,200

Schedule Variance = Earned value - Planned value

= $12,241,200 - $10,813,060

= $1,428,140

Schedule Performance Index (SPI)

= Earned value / Planned value

= $12,241,200 / $10,813,060

= 1.132

Actual Cost (AC)

= $1,294,000 + $8,994,000 + $4,994,000

= $15,282,000

Cost Performance Index (CPI)

= Earned value / Actual cost

= $12,241,200 / $15,282,000

= 0.801

3 0

3 years ago

If a production function is getting flatter as number of workers hired increases from 12 to 13; then the total cost curve would

Paha777 [63]

Answer:

True

Explanation:

The production function is getting flatter since the marginal productivity of the 13th worker is lower than the marginal productivity of the 12th worker, e.g. the 12th worker produced 10 units per hour, the 13th worker only produces 9 units per hour.

The total cost curve will get steeper because the total cost of producing more goods will increase due to the lower marginal productivity of the 13th worker, e.g. since both workers earn $10 per hour, the units produced by the 12th worker will have a direct labor cost of $1 per unit, while the units produced by the 13th worker will have a direct labor cost of $1.11 per unit.

3 0

3 years ago