The correct answer to this open question is the following.
The statements that correctly describe the story of the ancient Hebrews are the following.
A) The people first had a polytheistic religion that involved worshiping many gods.
B) The promises that God made to Abraham would happen only if Abraham obeyed God.
E) The story of the ancient Hebrews is found in the Hebrew Bible.
F) Twelve Israelite tribes formed the kingdom of Israel in the land of Canaan.
The story of the Hebrew people is so interesting. It can be found in the Torah and can be read in the first five books of the Bible, in the Old Testament. Hebrews considered that they are the people of God and that Yahweh asked them to find the promised land. These first books are the Genesis, the Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers, and Deuteronomy. Abraham was its patriarch. He born in Ur, Sumeria, and receive God's message to stop being polytheistic and only honor the one God. Then he led the migration to Cannan. Abraham had two sons; Isaac and Ishmael. Jacob was the son of Isaac and he had 12 sons who formed the 12 Tribes of Israel.
The Roman government like the US's had 3 branches consisting of a legislative branch, an executive branch, and a judicial branch. there are many more similarities but this is the main one. Hope it Helps
Jackson and Tocqueville shared values related to populism and individualism.
<h3>What values were adopted only by Tocqueville?</h3>
- Egalitarianism.
- Freedom.
- Laissez-faire.
As can be seen above, Tocqueville was an advocate of egalitarianism and liberty. This means that he believed that in a society everyone should have the right to freedom and should be seen as equal and worthy of the same right. In this case, we can consider that he would not support slavery in American countries, as he violated the two values he defended all his life.
Tocqueville would believe that slavery was a cruel system that devalued people and caused damage to freedom and social well-being.
Learn more about Tocqueville:
brainly.com/question/24465858
#SPJ1
Answer:
ruler refuses to be judged by the people, then anyone who judges that a ruler has overstepped his or her bounds may consider themself to be at war with that ruler
Explanation: