The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Anti-Federalist Papers and explain how it supports your position on the ratification of the Constitution.
I am going to choose a quote from Anti-Federalist No. 3, "New Constitution Creates a National Government, Will not Abate Foreign Influence, Dangers of Civil War and Despotism," written by John Francis Mercer. It was published in the Maryland Gazette on March 7, 1788.
This is the quote:<em> "In a national government, unless cautiously and fortunately administered, the disputes will be the deeprooted differences of interest, where part of the empire must be injured by the operation of general law." </em>
That is why antideferalists heavily opposed the creation of a strong central government, as was the intention of Federalists such as Jhon Jay and Alexander Hamilton. I agree with antifederalists like Thomas Jefferson, who believed in a simpler form of government, not despotic, that granted rights to the citizens. These rights were established in the Bill of Rights, the first ten amendments to the Constitution of the United States, drafted by federalist James Madison.
That would be the states.
My Lai Massacre.....the U.S. killed between 347 and 504 unarmed civilians in South Vietnam on March 16, 1968.
There are two different types of muslims: the sunni muslims and the shiite muslims. the source of conflict that these two muslim groups disagree on is the prophet muhammad’s sucession. the shiites believe that the prophet muhammad should have been succeeded by his son-in-law, while the sunnis believe that the leadership of the muslims should be passed down via hereditary succession.
hope this helps! :)
Masses of former slaves were needed to work for landowners, housing already existed
Assuming you're referring to the Civil War, African Americans received the best treatment in the North, since the North was fighting the war specifically to end the institution of slavery.
