1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Mnenie [13.5K]
3 years ago
8

22. Compare and contrast Discuss President George H.W. Bush's foreign policy by comparing an contrasting his decisions regarding

three of the following countries: China, Kuwait, Panama, Somalia, South Africa, and Yugoslavia. Explain why you think that he made the decisions that he made.
History
2 answers:
Rom4ik [11]3 years ago
8 0

Answer: I think that the president H.W. was a man of action and when he was at the crossroads in life, he always took the bull by the horns.

In China, the former US president is remembered in Beijing for helping stop links with Washington from breaking. The trust and personal ties he spent years creating often proved very important in bilateral relations .

He liberated Kuwait by sending troops after Saddan Hussein invaded that country. One Kuwaiti who named one of his son after Bush said: "He was a real man, a lion," said Mubarak al-Widhan, the father of the Kuwaiti Bush,  "He stood for our right for freedom, and he gave us back our country."

In Panama, he took out Noriega from power. In a nationally televised address, Bush claimed the invasion was necessary to withstand democracy in Panama. During the attack, the U.S. sent a force of 24,000 troops equipped with highly advanced weaponry and aircraft against a country with an army smaller than the New York City Police Department. An estimated 3,000 Panamanians died in the attack.

In Somalia, just weeks before Clinton took office, President George H. W. Bush had deployed American soldiers to Somalia, a coastal nation on the Horn of Africa, where people were in pain and dying from starvation and civil war. The soldiers were sent to guard food and other relief supplies from being stolen by fighting factions.

In Somalia, H.W. Bush advocated for the end of Apartheid, he said in a public speech: "We want to see the creation of a nonracial and democratic South Africa as a result of negotiations among legitimate representatives of all of South Africa's people. We support the beginning of a process leading to a peaceful transition to democracy."

In Yugoslavia, H.W. Bush practically said Milosevic to behave himself when he wrote this to him:  “The United States will be prepared to employ military force against the Serbians in Kosovo and in Serbia proper,”. A Yugoslavian pensioner  said: “I remember when the old Bush set the red lines to Milosevic not to touch us. From that day we had two supporters, God in the sky and America on earth,” said Shyqyri Nici, 70, pensioner.  

From my particular point of view, H.W Bush was a person that had very clear that actions speak louder than words and when he was at crossroads in life, he always took a decision.

Explanation:

balandron [24]3 years ago
3 0
I think they're making an attempt to seek out a typical<span> thread in their country. </span>I might prefer to<span> say that </span>they might prefer to apprehend<span> that </span>they might<span> be </span>a lot of possible<span> to be </span>concerned with the<span> deal or </span>one thing<span> else. Then, </span>you are simply quite showing<span> what it's </span>completely different<span> from the others, </span>even though<span> it's </span>simply a small distinction<span> and </span>you would like to elucidate<span>. </span>rely on<span> what was </span>happening<span> socially and politically with </span>every<span> country. Also, </span>rely on<span> what </span>each<span> of the countries' economy </span>seemed like<span> their military, were they </span>concerned in a very<span> war at the time, genocide? </span>these items may be in serious trouble<span> for you. Bush </span>created<span> the </span>bound<span> policies he </span>created for every<span> country. </span>and maybe might<span>|you'll|you may} have done </span>thus<span> with what countries or what policies </span>you think that<span> worked well or fell flat or what could have </span>created<span> them </span>higher<span> in your opinion.</span>
You might be interested in
If you were in Lincoln's position would you have kept General McClellan or replaced him as well? Why or why not? 4 SENTENCES
Dafna1 [17]

If I am to be in Lincoln's position I would   have removed General McClellan   because of his failure to perform up to the task of destroying Lee's army.

<h3>Why  should  General McClellan removed?</h3>

During the The Battle of Antietam  which can be described as the single bloodiest day during the  combat in the Civil War.

It was a battle that that  was presented as a Union victory in the Northern press  can be seen as  effect a tactical draw.

An during this battle ,  McClellan  was so frustrated and this makes him to fail by not be able to destroy Lee's arm.

However,  Lincoln officially removed him  from being the  commander hence If I am to be in Lincoln's position I would   have removed General McClellan   because of his failure to perform up to the task of destroying Lee's army.

Learn more   Lincoln at:

brainly.com/question/26112254

#SPJ1

7 0
1 year ago
“If a nation is attacked the only recourse is to attack back” Agree or disagree and why?
LUCKY_DIMON [66]
Not really,

It is reliant on the intensity of the attack as well as the power of the attacking nation.
 some countries have been attacked and literally never fought back but surrendered if the attacking nation is more powerful in terms of military power.
in case the intensity of the attack can be absorbed, a country can also opt for diplomacy as war is the ultimate sanction in international relation.
in case the country feels it has the capacity to protect its sovereignty then fighting back is the only option.
 
4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of the following was part of the Fugitive Slave Act passed in 1850?
Dominik [7]
Private citizens had to pay higher taxes for each runaway slave.
5 0
3 years ago
Write two adjectives about the House of Burgesses
weeeeeb [17]

assembly or legislature, you could possibly put democratically-elected.

idk hope i helped nevertheless :)

7 0
2 years ago
PLEASE HELP!!! WILL MARK BRAINLIEST!
Fofino [41]

The purpose of this text is to inform the people of the Hawaii islands of the efforts to weaken the effects of climate change as he mentioned the major businesses switching to cleaner energy and he had said that he puts as much time and energy available into the matter of climate change. He uses rhetoric form of speech to intensify the sentence by using words that put across a stronger image such as when he says "Alaska, where the sea is already swallowing villages and eating away at shorelines"

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Landless peasants were known as
    14·1 answer
  • Explain one reform that was part of the Indian New Deal.
    13·1 answer
  • Who was the prime minister that led the british against the nazis in ww2?
    6·1 answer
  • How do territories become states?
    5·2 answers
  • Who has the most power in Australia?
    14·1 answer
  • Which country in the world has the highest percentage of people under the age of 18?
    5·1 answer
  • What is it called when local governments join together in order to creatively solve issues?
    5·1 answer
  • What is longitude and latitude???
    14·2 answers
  • 3. What role did the Medici Family play in the start of the Renaissance?
    14·1 answer
  • Which of the following was a cause of democratic reforms in England?
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!