Answer:
Explanation:
The 'consolidated theft statute' encompasses all non violent theft offenses.
It includes cases of property theft like : Larcency (by trick) , Embezzlement (cheatedly converting it to defendant's property) , False Pretence (false fact representation to get property)
Cases not included under it : Violent Thefts -
- Robbery (with physical attack)
- Physically harming someone to gain their property
- cases lacking 'intent' to deliberately committing crime (just borrowing someone's property temporarily). Eg : A person borrowing neighbour's shovel for planting some expensive plants immediately
- A consensual non criminal conversion. Eg : A friend allowed another friend to take cash upto a certain limit from former's register, in case of latter's shortfall.
Answer:
Commercial impracticability is a defense that can be used when fulfilling a contract has become extraordinarily difficult or unfair for one party
Explanation:
Among the listed group of answers, the compatible definition of commercial impracticability is option A.
Commercial impracticability is a term that is used when the necessity to carry out a contract has either become extremely tedious or it is being done unfairly to a party.
The legality of this is that when there's an occurrence that'll likely make executing a contract become a burden or difficult to the executing party committed to such performance.
I think they should not since they have less developed brains and are more likely to get peer pressured into dangerous and unlawful stuff
The answer is B. i’m pretty sure
