After a thorough research, there exists the same question that has the full passage.
<span>One might think that proud English writers would welcome a broader readership. However, quite the opposite happened. Though scholars agreed that English was a great language, many felt that it was in danger. According to some scholars, when poorly educated people read, wrote, and spoke, they corrupted the English language.
Today, if you do not know how to spell a word, you look it up in the dictionary. During the early eighteenth century, there were few dictionaries. Those that did exist were mainly collections of difficult words or translation dictionaries (Latin to English, for example). There was no authority on the"correct" way to use or spell words.
</span>
The line in the passage that explains why English scholars felt a dire need to set standards for the English language is this one "<span>According to some scholars, when poorly educated people read, wrote, and spoke, they corrupted the English language."</span>
No. The comma isn’t necessary; therefore , it should be removed from the sentence.
TᕼE ᗩᑎᔕᗯEᖇ I TᕼIᑎK Iᔕ ᗩᑭᑭᖇO᙭. 10 GᗩᒪᒪIOᑎᔕ ᗷTᗯ TᕼIᔕ Iᔕ ᗰᗩTᕼ ᑎOT EᑎGᒪIᔕᕼ
India's geography is sort of tropical. In some regions green trees and grass stretch as far as the eye can see. India has high mountains, vast deserts, coasts, plains, forests, and more. India even has its own islands. In Cuba the geography is far less enticing, filled with rolling plains and rugged hills it is hardly as vast and exotic as India. Cuba has a few mountains but is mainly a stale island.
Cancer maybe? I think, Not sure
