Answer: Valuing diversity could be manged easier than managing diversity
Explanation:
Valuing diversity could be described as recognizing or observing the difference between people and acknowledge the fact that the differences are a valued asset. It is creating a work place that respects the differences about people but looks out more for what each individual is bringing to the team amidst all these, looking out for their potentials and how they can deliver, even in their differences.
An example of valuing diversity is having a group of different tribe of people or different religious people working in an environment. Communication does not really affect these process so long they are all focused on the task.
Managing diverities is defined as setting up a system or structure that tends to manage a group of people so that their potential advantage of diversity is maximized more than the disadvantages their diversity would bring.
An example of these is having the same temperamental kind of persons on the same team, assuming they all get angry easily, and working out a system that maximizes their effectiveness.
There could be a bridge in communication sometimes here than the valuing diversity.
After the French and Indian war was a win for England, colonists were unhappy with new rules made by England to repay their war debts and to prevent wars such as high taxes and the Proclamation of 1763 which banned settlers from going west of the Appalachian Mountains.
Answer:
Slave owners did not care about slaves no one did so the treatment of slaves was terrible. So slave owners most likely did not believe the there would be a actuall consaquence for breaking Code Noir's rules on Caring for a slave.
Explanation:
Explanation:
a native or naturalised member of state or nation who owes allegiance to its government and entitled to protection.
