<u>Answer</u>:
The main reasons for imposing a tariff are B tariff revenue and protecting jobs
<u>Explanation</u>:
Tariffs are essentially a tax payable on imports of goods to the custom authority of the consumer’s country so as to discourage excessive imports which may have a detrimental effect on the domestic economy.
The first main reason for imposing of tariff is Tariff Revenue. This basically means that the Government gain a hefty amount as taxes on imports not only from the manufacturers but also the domestic importers and thus forms a part of its revenue which is spent on the country’s developmental plans.
Secondly, tariffs are imposed for protecting jobs by preserving the domestic industry. This is especially the case when goods are imported from mass manufacturers in countries like China etc which pose a serious threat to small and medium scale industries in the Domestic market. By imposing tariff, these imported products are made more expensive, preventing losses to domestic producers and therefore protecting jobs.
The answer is the value of Shaping.
In psychology, shaping refers tot he process of achieving a certain desired results, by making that person used to a certain successful attempt that could lead to the result.
Other example would be someone who want to finish a marathon build the foundation of his success by first succeeding in completing smaller running distance.
Answer:
It's because of Nepal's topology.
Explanation:
Around 75% of Nepal is covered by mountains. In terms of transportation, They're considered as the most rugged and difficult terrain to pass through in the world.
This make the use of air transport becomes really integral to reach some areas of Nepal. People usually use road transport to a certain point (usually the big cities) and continue their journey to other parts of the country using small airplane.
Answer:
The correct answer to the following question will be "construct under-representation".
Explanation:
- CU arises whenever the test undermines legitimacy even though the contents of the review do not demonstrate relevant qualifications or knowledge.
- This is a consistency hazard which often means an examination has become too small and does not include essential aspects or features of that same defined structure.
Therefore, it's the right answer.
