Answer:
of a religious conflict
Explanation:
Indira Gandhi was the prime minister of India. She was killed by her ‘Sikh Bodyguards’ Satwant Singh and Beant Singh. It is believed to have happened because of the so called Operation Blue Star, which was a military action that was meant to remove the militant religious leader Jarnail Singh Bhindranwale and his many followers from the buildings of the Harmandir Sahib ( the Golden Temple). It seems this resulted in the death of many Sikh, which caused a raising sentiment of rage and injustice int he community.
The states strengthened and gained control over colonies through:
- Trade
- Warfare
- Diplomacy
- Power transfer
<h3>What were the colonies?</h3>
These were the areas that the British government had under their commands in the areas that they took over.
The colonizers settled in different areas such as Africa, North America and some parts of South America.
These areas were strengthened based on trade and the fact that the places were homes to a lot of raw materials.
Read more on colonies here:brainly.com/question/7829931
Answer:
Napoleon Bonaparte was a French military general, the first emperor of France and one of the world's greatest military leaders. Napoleon revolutionized military organization and training, sponsored the Napoleonic Code, reorganized education and established the long-lived Concordat with the papacy.
Explanation:
Answer:
Explanation:
By Tom Jawetz July 22, 2019, 4:45 am
Restoring the Rule of Law Through a Fair, Humane, and Workable Immigration System
Getty/Mario Tama
New U.S. citizens gather at a naturalization ceremony, March 2018.
OVERVIEW
Policymakers must break free of the false dichotomy of America as either a nation of immigrants or a nation of laws, and advance an immigration system that is fair, humane, and actually works.
PRESS CONTACT
For more information and updates on this topic, see CAP’s series: “Reframing the Immigration Debate.”
Introduction and summary
The immigration debate in America today is nearly as broken as the country’s immigration system itself. For too many years, the conversation has been predicated on a false dichotomy that says America can either honor its history and traditions as a nation of immigrants1 or live up to its ideals as a nation of laws by enforcing the current immigration system.2 Presented with this choice,3 supporters of immigration—people who recognize the value that immigrants bring to American society, its culture, and its economy, as well as the important role that immigrants play in the nation’s continued prosperity—have traditionally seized the mantle of defending America as a nation of immigrants.4 By doing this, however, rather than challenging the dichotomy itself, supporters have ceded powerful rhetorical ground to immigration restrictionists, who are happy to masquerade as the sole defenders of America as a nation of laws.5 The fundamental problem with this debate is that America is, and has always been, both a nation of immigrants and a nation of laws. Debates over a liberal immigration policy actually predate the start of the nation itself; they infused the drafting of the U.S. Constitution, America’s founding document.6
GET THE LATEST ON IMMIGRATION
Email
