Answer:
But the fact is that Washington and Adams were very different and some of that difference originates with their origins. Washington was a Virginian, a southerner and a slave owner; Adams was from Massachusetts and opposed slavery on principle and one of the few founding fathers never to own them.
Explanation:
please mark this answer as brainliest
Answer:
one way to effectively limit the power of interests groups is the political system is democratic or authoritarian. Because there generally are few restrictions on interest groups in democratic societies, they have more options available (e.g., hiring lobbyists, using the press, and staging public demonstrations). Thus, strategies and tactics are more formalized and open than in authoritarian societies, where they must be more ad hoc and less publicly visible.
Answer: Hello There!!
<em>
</em><em>Key Points</em>
<em>The Bill of Right’s provision on the freedom of speech was incorporated against the states in Gitlow v. New York (1925).</em>
<em>Core political speech, expressive speech, and most types of commercial speech are protected under the First Amendment.</em>
<em>Certain types of speech (particularly, speech that can h.arm others) is not protected, such as obscenity, fighting words, true threats, defamation, or invasion of privacy. Speech related to national security or state secrets may also not be protected.
</em><em>Freedom of Speech
</em><em>Freedom of speech in the United States is protected by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution and by many state constitutions as well.</em>
<em />
<em>The freedom of speech is not absolute. The Supreme Court of the United States has recognized several categories of speech that are excluded, and it has recognized that governments may enact reasonable time, place, or manner restrictions on speech.</em>
<em />
<em>Critici-m of the government and advocacy of unpopular ideas that people may find distasteful or against public policy are almost always permitted. There are exceptions to these general protections. Within these limited areas, other limitations on free speech balance rights to free speech and other rights, such as rights for authors and inventors over their works and discoveries (copyright and patent), protection from imminent or potential violence against particular persons (restrictions on fighting words), or the use of untruths to harm others. Distinctions are often made between speech and other acts which may have symbolic significance.The freedom of speech is not absolute. The Supreme Court of the United States has recognized several categories of speech that are excluded, and it has recognized that governments may enact reasonable time, place, or manner restrictions on speech.
</em>
Explanation: I hope this helps!!
He was concerned about the size of the government <span />
