Answer:
I think its important since it ends all suffering and makes the person soul go to rest. just saying
From a Darwinian perspective it could be argued that nature and war are connected since those who are the "fittest" are able to gain the most resources and survive. Therefore, one group will always be trying to take from another.
Explorers had problems with the tides and waves sinking the boats
Ronald Reagan had the following jobs before running for president:
Radio sportscaster (in Iowa, from 1932 to 1937)
Movie actor (from 1937 to 1957)
... During that time he also served in the military during World War II, in a non-combat role due to near-sightedness. He made training films for the military.
He served as president of the Screen Actors Guild from 1947 to 1954.
He was narrator of the TV program, General Electric Theater, and after that, host of the TV program, Death Valley Days.
He was then Governor of California from 1967 to 1975.
<em>The rule of the British in India is possibly the most controversial and the most hotly debated aspect of the history of the British empire. Admirers of British rule point to the economic developments, the legal and administrative system, the fact that India became the centre of world politics. Critics of British rule generally point out that all of these benefits went to a tiny British ruling class and the majority of Indians gained little. Admirers of British rule counter this by saying that most Indians were poor and oppressed by their own leaders before the British arrived, and that British rule was less harsh on ordinary Indians than rule by Indian princes.
</em>
<em>
</em>
<em>Perhaps the main reason why the arguments are so heated and so complex is that India was very different from the other territories that made up the empire. North America and Australia, for example, were sparsely populated and their populations were less economically developed than Britain. India, however, had a huge population and was just as developed as Britain in the 1700s when the British arrived.
</em>
<em>
</em>
<em>The British were able to take control of India mainly because India was not united. The British signed treaties and made military and trading alliances with many of the independent states that made up India. The British were very effective at infiltrating these states and gradually taking control. They often left the local princes in charge of the various parts of India. These local princes were effective at maintaining British rule and gained much from being loyal to the British.</em>
