Answer:
A
It was the closest answer to the options that were given but I'm sorry if it's wrong
If I was an ordinary person in my 1930s and aged 40 with a middle income job such as an 'office assistant', I would not be in favour of helping other countries.
I would personally prefer a policy of isolation from the rest of the world. Primarily, this would be because I had seen with my very won eyes, the death and destruction bought on by World War I and more importantly the Great Depression.
With millions of job less people, poverty and people barely making ends meet, I would want our government to concentrate on the welfare of our own people, rather than go to war with countries thousands of miles away.
Answer:
His natural talents were mediocre and intellectually Robespierre was inferior to the leaders of the revolution, such as, Danton or Mirabeau.
Explanation: hope this helps :D
To begin, it didn't promote "peace" as much as it promoted a "cold war" which is the whole point of the name, Cold War.
Nuclear Weapons essentially forced the US and the Soviet Union into an uncomfortable draw.
They knew they couldn't fight each other directly so they fought each other in a series of devastating proxy wars around the world.
