All categories

3 years ago

What is the executive branch responsible for?

2 answers:

6 0

The executive branch of the U.S. government is responsible for enforcing laws; its power is vested in the President. The President acts as both the head of state and commander-in-chief of the armed forces. Independent federal agencies are tasked with enforcing the laws enacted by Congress.

horrorfan [7]3 years ago

3 0

Answer:

The executive branch of the U.S government carries out the laws.

Explanation:

In the constitution of the U.S, the federal government is divided into three branches in order to share power in a unified way. Those three branches are: legislative, executive and judicial. Let`s see them in detail!

Legislative: It is in charge of making the laws. This branch includes the congress (the congress and house of representatives). U.S citizens have the right to vote for senators and representatives.

Executive: it enforces and implements the laws. it means that this branch makes the laws become something "real". This branch is mainly compound by the president of the nation, the vice-president, the cabinet and executive departments.

* The president of the nation: Leads the country and he or she is the head of the state, he or she serves for four years.

* vice-president: He or she supports the president`s decisions. The vice-president can become the president if the president is unable to lead the country.

* The cabinet: this is a group of people that serve as advisors for the president. they are nominated b the president.

Judicial: it applies the laws. It is mainly made up of the supreme court and federal courts. The supreme court is situated in Washington D.C. and it is responsible for deciding if the laws violate the constitution.

You might be interested in

What is the legislative branch in Japan's government called

lorasvet [3.4K]

Answer:

National Diet

Explanation:

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

When Estrella reads the text from her friend in the emergency room, she immediately knows that something is wrong. This is an ex

professor190 [17]

Answer: Listening

Explanation:

According to the given question, when Estella try to read the given text in emergency room that is given from her friend and the she immediately realize that the something went wrong.

This is best illustrating the example of listening as it is the ability of interpreting the given message and then convert in into the effective communication process.

It is one o the ability that properly understand the speaker and then immoderately interpreting the information.

Therefore, Listening is the correct answer.

6 0

3 years ago

Richard knows he's a take-charge kind of person. He is a good student, and knows it is because of his hard work. What type of at

Nata [24]

This type of attribution is the external attribution. He interprets his situation as being caused by his hard work. He interprets himself as a good student with the reason that he is hard working. In this type of attribution, a person is interpreting what is happening to him or to an individual based on what he has done or what situation he is in.

5 0

3 years ago

Dr. smith is doing a study to determine what 9-year-olds know. based on theory, he believes that the 9-year-olds will advance in

kati45 [8]

Vygotsky's theory of cognitive development

6 0

3 years ago

Distinguish between functional and dysfunctional conflict and discuss why people avoid conflict

jeyben [28]

Functional conflict is a conflict that is productive to the long term goals of the people involved, and is respectful of all its participants. For example, two people having an honest debate about how best to spend a limited amount of finances, while being conscious of each others opinions, is a functional conflict.
Dysfunctional conflict is characterized by loud voices, name-calling, and not listening to what other people say. When an argument devolves into insults and epithets, this is dysfunctional.
People avoid conflict because they either fear hurt emotions, or fear that they do not possess the ability to argue persuasively or clearly enough to "win" the conflict.

3 0

3 years ago