The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Te question does not mention any individual in specific, so we assume that we choose the individual we like to write the testimonial.
We choose Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. He was an important figure and led the civil rights movement in the United States. He followed the ideals of liberty and tolerance and influenced millions of people. On his positive side, Dr. King could congregate thousands of people to the civil rights movement cause. He set the example. He was at the very front of the protests and marches. One very good thing he had was that he supported peaceful demonstrations, never violent protests. His "Letter From the Birmingham Jail" and "I Haad a Dream" speech, have influenced modern leaders around the world.
On the negative side, probably he could have been more open and tolerant to negotiate with authorities or to join forces with other black leaders such as Malcolm X, that although he used violence in his protests, the union of more African American leaders could have taken the movement to different dimensions and accomplishments.
Answer: Money is used for the trade of needs and even services to on another. It’s a exchange system. Money can be used to get services like a haircut or it can be used to buy needs like food from a grocery store.
his speech, he talked about a third alternative, he said if only British government were able to form alliances among countries against Germany and if they are able to strengthen air force and British Army, only then they could have prevented Germany from taking Sudetenland. He believed that Germany will continue to expand its territories eyeing in Western Europe and British territories are not exempted.
Read more on Brainly.com - brainly.com/question/3353438#readmore
Answer:
ogden
Explanation:
In 1819 Ogden sued Thomas Gibbons, who was operating steamboats in the same waters without the authority of Fulton and Livingston. Ogden won in 1820 in the New York Court of Chancery . Gibbons appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court, contending that he was protected by terms of a federal license to engage in coasting trade.
