Answer:
list the statements so I can answer the question
or is this a writing question?
Im gonna assume its a writing question
Influence voters to vote for or against a candidate based on what they believe others will do.Typically, this is done for political topics.Usually, the emphasis is on the candidates rather than the issues.Opinion polls can thus be detrimental to a candidate's election, which is why political machines spend significant sums to ensure that candidates receive positive opinion polls.
Thi question is incomplete. Here´s the complete question.
The 2013 case of Windsor v. United States in the Second Circuit Court of Appeals employed ___ in holding that the Defense of Marriage Act held no legitimate state interest and thus overturned it.
Answer: intermediate scrutiny
Explanation:
In United States v. Windsor, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals confirmed the lower court's decision that Section 3 of DOMA was unconstitutional.
The court found that, since homosexuals had been historically subjected to discrimination, they could be considered as a group that falls under a "quasi-suspect classification", and therefore intermediate scrutiny could be applied.
DOMA was deemed unconstitutional under the equal protection guarantees of the Fifth Amendment because it didn´t pass that test.
Answer:
The owner does not believe in helping enslaved people escape.
Explanation:
The owner was scared that if he was to be caught with the slaves he was going to be arrested or punished by a big fine.
I believe all lives matter
Answer:
When Epps is drunk, he whips his slaves for pure entertainment, whereas when he’s sober, he whips his slaves to make them work harder and faster. Epps’ alcoholism means he has two cruel personalities instead of one, but the common thread is that Epps takes his own violent tendencies out on his slaves no matter what.
Explanation:
