Political scientists have generally found that justices' decisions are most closely tied to<u> </u><u>their political ideologies.</u>
It is a frequent misconception that Supreme Court justices' voting decisions primarily reflect their beliefs, principles, or personal policy preferences.
However, this supposition has never been sufficiently verified using objective assessments of the ideological beliefs of the justices, that is, assessments that are not based on their votes on the Court.
We derive independent and trustworthy measures of the values of every Supreme Court justice from Earl Warren to Anthony Kennedy using content analytic approaches.
The attitudinal paradigm is firmly supported by the close correlation between these values and the justices' votes.
To learn more about Political Scientists here
brainly.com/question/10369837
#SPJ4
The statement "The readers' guide does not handle enough magazine entries to be of great consequence." is False. I hope my answer has come to your help. God bless and have a nice day ahead! Feel free to post your questions here in Brainly.
Complete question:
Why does the insured get the benefit of the doubt if an insurance policy contains any
ambiguities or uncertainties?
A)because insurance contracts are aleatory
B)because insurance contracts are unilateral
C)because insurance contracts are conditional
D)because insurance contracts are contracts of adhesion
Answer: because insurance contracts are contracts of adhesion (Option D)
Explanation:
The insured gets a benefit of doubt if an insurance policy contains any ambiguities or uncertainties because it is included in the policy document been given to a policyholder at the inception of the insurance policy, which is stated in the arbitration clause of the policy document.