What court case gave the supreme court the power of judicial review

Law

1 answer:

Katarina [22]3 years ago

6 0

Marbury v. Madison was the case which gave the Supreme Court the power of judicial review.

Explanation:

Marbury v. Madison was the case in which the Supreme Court, where the Court asserted its authority for judicial review, calling a law unconstitutional.

In the end of the Judge’s opinion in this judgment, Chief Justice John Marshall explained that this is the responsibility of the Supreme Court to reverse the unconstitutional law because it is necessary result of a Judge’s pledge to maintain the writings of the Constitution as directed in Article 6 in our Constitution.

The Judicial review can be defined as the power of Supreme Court to check and decide in case of a violation of existing law.

You might be interested in

What is the author's argument? A) Youth voting makes sense to the author. B) Everyone wants their voice and opinion to count. C)

Airida [17]

Answer:

Last option

Explanation:

3 0

2 years ago

Alcohol consumed in______ puts strain on the heart.

bagirrra123 [75]

Answer: C large amount

4 0

3 years ago

While the President of the United States has the power to veto federal laws passed by the U.S. House and Senate, the Governor of

stellarik [79]

Answer:

The Florida governor can veto state laws.

5 0

3 years ago

Presidential appointments and treaties must be approved by

Sedaia [141]

The Vice President of the United States serves as President of the Senate and may cast the decisive vote in the event of a tie in the Senate. The Senate has the sole power to confirm those of the President's appointments that require consent, and to ratify treaties.

4 0

3 years ago

Do juveniles sufficiently understand Miranda warning and be able to waive their constitutional rights to remain silent or speak

patriot [66]

According to data, it is found that juveniles do not sufficiently understand the Miranda warning and find it difficult to exercise their right of remaining silent.

<h3><u>Explanation: </u></h3>

Juveniles are far more sensitive than adults are. This is the reason what may not mean coercion in the case of an adult may be considered as coercion in the case having a juvenile involved. According to the data obtained from a number of juvenile justice cases, it is clear that the juveniles do not choose to make use of their right to remain silent.

This may be either because they don't properly come to terms with what Miranda rights actually are or they are too vulnerable to the interrogation and can't resist speaking out of fear.

4 0

3 years ago