Answer:
You are the trial judge at the sentencing hearing. If you wish, you can rely on the suppressed confession for a sentence enhancement, in effect imposing the same sentence Bertha would have received for second-degree murder. Should you do so? Why or why not?
b. If you were on the appellate court reviewing Bertha’s sentence imposed as described in (a), would you rule that this sentence is fair?
The FRCP 26(a)(2)(B) (Rule 26)
The FRCP 26(a)(2)(B) is a requirement for the expert witness. If the expert fails to include this, then there is a high chance that the testimony can be thrown out.
I hope this helps! :)
Answer: we need a,b,c,d to find out
Explanation: didn’t help
Answer: BY THE THREE ARMS OF GOVERNMENT (THE EXECUTIVE,THE LEGISLATURE AND THE JUDICIARY)
Explanation:The three arms of Government are an example of the constitutional principle of checks and balance.
Check and balance is the concept enshrined in the a Democratic Constitution where each of the arms of Government act as a watch for the other arm.
The legislature checkmates the activities of The Executive to prevent abuse of Power they can summon the Executive arm if they discovered any anomally.
The Judiciary have the powers to interpret laws to bring about fairness and justice for both the Executive and legislative arms.
The Executive through the president has the power not to sign bills passed by the legislature if it is not in line with existing laws.etc
