That is a Rhetorical question
Answer:
Find the explanation below.
Explanation:
1. He drew the contrasts between death and rebirth when he explained that the contact which the new generation of children have with nature is dying. He explained that there is a possibility of a rebirth of wonder and joy where man can begin his meaningful interaction with nature.
Evidence from the text:
My sons may yet experience what author Bill McKibben has called "the end of nature," the final sadness of a world where there is no escaping man. But there is another possibility: not the end of nature, but the rebirth of wonder and even joy.
2. He drew a contrast between being broken and healing when he explained that the bond between the young and nature was broke. He also explained that nature did have a therapeutic effect as seen from some studies. Making it a point to heal the bond between the young people and nature would be beneficial to all.
Evidence from the text:
Yet, at the very moment that the bond is breaking between the young and the natural world, a growing body of research links our mental, physical, and spiritual health directly to our association with nature—in positive ways.
Reducing that deficit—healing the broken bond between our young and nature—is in our self-interest, not only because aesthetics or justice demands it, but also because our mental, physical, and spiritual health depends upon it.
Answer:
self-serving bias
Explanation:
Self-serving bias refers to the propensity to associate adverse circumstances with external causes, whereas favorable events are the cause of personal credit. In other words, people attribute success to personal qualities, while they blame outside sources for their failures. As a result, in "The Breakfast Club," Vernon cannot accept his wrongdoing as a principal and holds the children responsible for being arrogant and misbehaving.
It has an impact on everyday use because it gives a different insight on how one person views an event or just anything in general. While one person may have viewed things in a certain way, another person would have caught onto more details or different things that someone else didnt