<span>Germany acted semi-schizophrenic and left Battle of Britain halfway to go attack Soviets. Bad Idea, like a beaten (but not knocked out) Boxer, UK Rebounded to cause major pain for Germany exposing them to Dual Front.Japanese Battles happened for the most part on water among Carriers and with Marine Amphibious forces where as for Germany, major part was land battles involving Armor. Geography to blame only partially.Germany tacked on the Racial genocide to the War due to Ideology, Japanese didn’t so directly but they treated really badly the other nationalities, particularly Chinese.There were Shades of Trade war for the Japanese Motivations, not so for Germans.Japan lasted longer and would have even more so, had it not been for the Nukes. Germany, caught in pincer movement, could not keep up the war of attrition.End of hostilities resulted in Divided Germany, not so in case of Japan.<span>Apart from Anzac participation, major combatants in Pacific were Americans and Japanese, whereas, in Europe there were quite a handful. Hope this helped!</span></span>
This is part of globalization
This is when businesses interact with other businesses and consumers worldwide.
Answer:
The early 20th century was a crucial point for the development of the Middle East. Prior to 1950, the region exhibited low levels of socioeconomic development; however, the discovery of vast oil reserves catalyzed the rapid creation of wealth. In particular, the economies of oil-rich countries were transformed from largely agricultural to rentier economies. Rentier economies derive a substantial part of their revenue from the outside world, and the accruing of external revenues (also called rents) are allocated and redistributed.
Since then, modern Arab oil-exporting economies have become heavily dependent on oil. Hydrocarbon and government activities account for the majority of total GDP in nearly every Middle Eastern country. In Libya, for instance, non-oil and non-governmental activities account for just over 0.16% of the GDP. Likewise, oil accounts for 80% of total exports in half of the oil-exporting economies. [1]
Given this dependence, it’s not surprising that the economies of these oil exporting countries are significantly tied to the price of oil itself. Between 2014 and 2015, caused by a combination of declining global demand and a rapid increase in the production of American shale oil, the price of oil collapsed.This piece explores how the dramatic reduction in oil prices affected the economic and political structures within the Middle East. To do so, this piece will analyze the effects of the 2014-2015 reduction in three countries: Saudi Arabia, Iran, and Iraq. In particular, the analysis will explore the pre-2014 economic conditions, how the economies were affected during the period of low oil prices, and what political and economic changes have occurred since.Saudi Arabia, the world’s largest petroleum exporter and home of 18 percent of the world’s oil reserves, depends greatly on the price of oil. [3] Its economic, domestic, and foreign policies are all intimately connected with petroleum, and the drastic decrease in the price of oil in 2014-2015 has had significant effects on the country’s domestic policies, as well as the future implications for regional politics and markets.
Explanation:
He has doubts about the constitution. Since it didn’t give power to the states but in the end he decided it was the best option. Due to the fact of the rebellions from the anti-federalist for an example Shay’s Rebellion that occurred he believed that there should be federal backing. His role however was to become the president because once ratified they needed someone to become president and he was elected with 100% of the electoral votes. In the end Washington had said that the Constitution wouldn’t late 20 years
Answer:
Brainliest please
Explanation:
The United States was justified in going to war because Mexico had exfoliate American blood on American soil, Texas (a land that numerous Mexicans still considered theirs) was an independent democracy and had the right to govern itself, and Texas was trying to come part of the United States, which means that the United States.
During 1846-1848, Mexico and the United States were mooting over whether Texas and California was Mexico's home or America's home.. The United States was unjustified in going into war with Mexico because President JamesK. Polk provoked it, the thievery of land, and the slavery expansion.
