Answer: Small states are easier to manage politically, while large states are more likely to be corrupt.
Explanation:
During the Constitutional Convention of 1787, large states claimed to deserve more of a voice due to their larger populations, so they demanded congressional representation to be based on population.
Smaller states, fearing being ignored if that happened, wanted equal representation.
Roger Sherman, based on the idea of small states being easier to be handle politically, and large states being more prone to corruption, proposed the Connecticut Compromise with Oliver Ellsworth, which granted equal representation in the Senate and representation by population in the House, in a bicameral system that provided a balance of power.
The most likely result is <span>The government changes its policies on a subject the group cares about
Interest groups operate by providing support to representatives through either popularity campaign or financial aid. If they managed to won their chosen representative, it would be very likely that the representative will make regulations that would benefit the interest groups.</span>
Answer: B
Explanation: B because it seems more right an that is what i think
I'm really confused. If you tell me the question, I can help you.
