Answer:
the right to vote in local elections until the adults have established residency
Explanation:
Before being allowed to participate in local elections, all states require the voters to have live in their current residency for a specific period of time. (most states require you to live there for 366 days before considered as local residents)
This policies was created to prevent voters fraud. Without this policy, somebody can move to another local residency during the election period in order to cast their votes more than once.
In Gideon v. Wainwright, the Supreme Court overturned their previous ruling in Betts v. Brady that states were not required to provide counsel-(c) <u>The Sixth Constitutional amendment</u> was interpreted in both of these case
Explanation:
- The sixth Amendment states that the right of counsel is the fundamental right for a free trial
- <u>As per the sixth Amendment in the Gideon v. Wainwright,Gideon applead to the court to provide a legal lawyer as he was too poor to pay the fee of the lawyer .So the Sixth amendment was passed,which guarantees the right of counsel is the fundamental right for a free trial.</u>
- <u>But in the Betts v. Brady case the Court overruled the the sixth Amendment act which which guarantees the right of counsel is the fundamental right for a free trial.</u>
<u></u>
So , in Gideon v. Wainwright, the Supreme Court overturned their previous ruling in Betts v. Brady that states were not required to provide counsel-(c) <u>The Sixth Constitutional amendment</u> was interpreted in both of these case
Answer:
B) a writing system used in ancient Egypt
Answer:
Molecular because sulfur and oxygen are both nonmetals
Explanation:
A reason that the National Popular Vote, Inc. And others criticize the electoral vote system is D-Because they believe that elections should be determined by the popular vote.
The National Popular Vote, Inc wants to do away with the indirect method of voting through the Electoral College. The reason for this is that the College system may end up causing that eventually, the winner of the election is the candidate who lost the popular vote. As it was the case in the 2000 and 2016 elections.
