1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
RoseWind [281]
3 years ago
9

How was japans colonization of asia similiar to europes colonization of africa

History
1 answer:
anastassius [24]3 years ago
4 0

European power of France, Britain, Belgium and Netherlands were keen to take advantage of Africa's abundant natural resources including Gold, Silver, Minerals and even Slave labor.

Similarly, the Japanese knew they lived in a small piece of land which was resource-poor and isolated from the rest of the world.

By expanding and colonizing Asian countries, they wanted to take advantage of local resources which including abundant food and millions of people as slaves.

You might be interested in
Which of the following is not a purpose of the dictionary? Select all that apply. The dictionary is a tool for language study. T
Levart [38]
Dictionary promotes language change.
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
As chicanos became urban and rural wage workers,what problems did they confront?why was Mexican labor so important?in which indu
valkas [14]

Answer:

Mexicans were not accepted into unions, and they had to be content with the most difficult and poorly paid jobs. They were constantly replenishing the most disenfranchised group of American workers - seasonal agricultural workers who roamed the country. They were mainly recruited to collect long-fiber cotton in Arizona (which requires a lot of skills), to beet plantations and sugar mills in Colorado, Arkansas, and other states. Mexicans also worked on the building of railways.

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
What is a constitution?
victus00 [196]

Answer:

C- A document explaining the rights of the people of a country which are protected by law.

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
What is not a reason given in the article as to why the Soviet Union continuing to gain power was a problem for the United State
fenix001 [56]

Answer:

<em>Hello There Again. the correct Answer B. </em><u><em>Soviet Union seeks to spread a "fanatic" belief in communism, which is opposite the beliefs of the United States.</em></u>

Explanation:

Because The concept of "socialism in one country" was conceived by Stalin in his struggle against Leon Trotsky and his concept of permanent revolution. In 1924, Trotsky published his pamphlet Lessons of October in which he stated that socialism in the Soviet Union would fail because of the backward state of economic development unless a world revolution began. Stalin responded to Trotsky's pamphlet with his article, "October and Comrade Trotsky's Theory of Permanent Revolution". In it, Stalin stated, that he did not believe an inevitable conflict between the working class and the peasants would take place, further adding that "socialism in one country is completely possible and probable". Stalin held the view common amongst most Bolsheviks at the time; there was possibility of real success for socialism in the Soviet Union despite the country's backwardness and international isolation. While Grigoriy Zinoviev, Lev Kamenev and Nikolai Bukharin, together with Stalin, opposed Trotsky's theory of permanent revolution, they diverged on how socialism could be built. According to Bukharin, Zinoviev and Kamenev supported the resolution of the 14th Conference (held in 1925) which stated that "we cannot complete the building of socialism due to our technological backwardness." Despite the rather cynical attitude, Zinoviev and Kamenev did believe that a defective form of socialism could be constructed. At the 14th Conference, Stalin reiterated his position, claiming that socialism in one country was feasible despite the capitalist blockade of the country. After the conference, Stalin wrote "Concerning the Results of the XIV Conference of the RCP(b)", in which he stated that the peasantry would not turn against the socialist system because he believed they had a self-interest in preserving.[43] The contradictions which would arise with the peasantry during the socialist transition, Stalin surmised, could "be overcome by our own efforts". He concluded that the only viable threat to socialism in the Soviet Union was a military intervention.

In late 1925, Stalin received a letter from a party official which stated that his position of "Socialism in One Country" was in contradiction with Friedrich Engels own writings on the subject. Stalin countered, stating that Engels' writings 'reflected' "the era of pre-monopoly capitalism, the pre-imperialist era when there were not yet the conditions of an uneven, abrupt development of the capitalist countries." From 1925 onwards, Bukharin began writing extensively on the subject, and in 1926, Stalin wrote On Questions of Leninism, which contained his best-known writings on the subject. Trotsky, with the publishing of Leninism, began countering Bukharin's and Stalin's arguments, claiming that socialism in one country was possible, but only in the short-run, and claimed that without a world revolution it would be impossible to safeguard the Soviet Union from the "restoration of bourgeoisie relations". Zinoviev on the other hand, disagreed with both Trotsky and Bukharin and Stalin, holding instead steadfast to Lenin's own position from 1917 to 1922, and continued to claim that only a defecting form of socialism could be constructed in the Soviet Union without a world revolution. Bukharin, by now, began arguing for the creation of an autarkic economic model, while Trotsky, in contrast, claimed that the Soviet Union had to participate in the international division of labour to develop. In contrast to Trotsky and Bukharin, Stalin did not believe a world revolution was possible, claiming in 1938 that a world revolution was in fact impossible, and claiming that Engels was wrong on the matter. At the 18th Congress, Stalin took the theory to its inevitable conclusion, claiming that the communist mode of production could be conceived in one country. He rationalised this by claiming that the state could exist in a communist society, as long as the Soviet Union was encircled by capitalism. However, surprisingly, with the establishment of socialist regimes in Eastern Europe, Stalin claimed that socialism in one country was only possible in a large country like the Soviet Union, and that the other states, in order to survive, had to follow the Soviet line.

6 0
3 years ago
During the Congressional Reconstruction era, African Americans in Texas did all EXCEPT:
Greeley [361]

Answer:

D)serve as governor

Explanation:

Did it on Edge-2020

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • The Indo-European language is thought to have originated around _____.
    8·2 answers
  • How much did the cast of that 70s show make per episode?
    9·2 answers
  • Why did native-born Americans resent the new immigrants who came to the United States around the turn of the 20th century?
    9·1 answer
  • During the neolithic era which change first resulted in the creation of settled communities
    5·1 answer
  • Term used to describe the distribution of power among distinct branches of government
    8·1 answer
  • Why did European nations respect the policy set forth in the Monroe Doctrine?
    14·1 answer
  • How did humphrey win the nomination
    14·2 answers
  • How did American involvement in world war ll impact race relations in the military
    10·1 answer
  • What did the Canadian government offer mennonites as " pull factors" to Canada?
    5·1 answer
  • What makes ancient<br> Egyptian art and<br> architecture stand<br> out?
    12·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!