1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
kogti [31]
3 years ago
6

How did the Supreme Court case, Gibbons v. Ogden, affect interstate commerce?

History
2 answers:
Juli2301 [7.4K]3 years ago
7 0

It determined that only the federal government could regulate interstate commerce.

The case of Gibbons v. Ogden regarded the interstate shipping trade and whether or not the states could regulate or if it was Congress's job to regulate.

The decision from the Marshall Court stated it was the job of Congress under the Commerce Clause to regulate trade between states to include shipping. New York was not able to regulate the trade taking place in the waterways between states. One of the justices included in a supporting decision that the federal interstate laws superseded the state laws and the federal government was the ultimate power on interstate trade.

AleksandrR [38]3 years ago
5 0

Answer: (A)

Explanation: It determined that only the federal government could regulate interstate commerce.

You might be interested in
Upload your project on government violence below.
Brut [27]

Answer:

Explanation:

Government sanctioned violence under Mao was interpreted by Mao as necessary to preserve the state of continuous revolution, in which China would continue to evolve and shed the shackles of its dynastic past. Although violence was used against political opponents, Mao was more secure in his power and there was not as much threat of overthrow. Mao's main objective in his violent projects, such as the Cultural Revolution,was to keep China from achieving stability and the complacence that may have came with it. Although misguided, his intention was for a new China, united under the doctrine of Communism and with a desire to start fresh, to emerge. Stalin mainly used violence as a tool for suppressing dissent and consolidating his power. He did not want to cause disorder through violence, which was a secondary objective for Mao, but wanted to make sure that no one could challenge his dominance in the USSR. He sent political opponents to gulags or had them killed for the sake of making them disappear, while Mao often sent people in the party to internment camps for "reeducation", only to call upon them later to serve in the government.

6 0
3 years ago
In what ways does the Age of Reason compare with the "golden age" of classical Greece?
Nutka1998 [239]

Answer:

The “golden age” of Greece lasted for little more than a century but it laid the foundations of western civilization. The age began with the unlikely defeat of a vast Persian army by badly outnumbered Greeks and it ended with an inglorious and lengthy war between Athens and Sparta. This era is also referred to as the “Age of Pericles” after the Athenian statesman who directed the affairs of Athens when she was at the height of her glory.

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Need help now pls!!!!!! Its a quiz.
Galina-37 [17]

Answer:

a

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What led to the creation of suburbs in the early 1900s
slega [8]

In the illustrative case of Rome, Italy, in the 1920s and 1930s, suburbs were intentionally created ex novo in order to give lower classes a destination, in consideration of the actual and foreseen massive arrival of poor people from other areas of the country.

so railways



8 0
3 years ago
This stated the US would prevent European nations from interfering with independent American countries. The US also agreed to re
trapecia [35]

The answer is the Monroe Doctrine. This Doctrine was stated by the fifth President of the United States, James Monroe, on December 2, 1823, and became the foreign policy of the nation for many years.  

The doctrine stated that:

●<em> The efforts of European nations to colonize land in North or South America, are considered as acts of aggression, requiring U.S. intervention</em>.

●<em> Any interference by European nations with states of North or South America would also be perceived as acts of aggression and would call for U.S. intervention</em>.

● <em>The United States would not interfere with existing European colonies</em>.

● <em>The United States would not get involved with the internal affairs of European nations</em>.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The roots of Christianity are found in what early religion? Buddhism Catholicism Judaism Islam
    10·2 answers
  • Please select the word from the list that best fits the definition
    7·1 answer
  • In which system of government do the people have the most political power
    9·2 answers
  • Which of the following statements reflect the complexities of the current debate regarding undocumented aliens? Select all that
    9·1 answer
  • The most basic weakness of ____ was____.
    15·1 answer
  • Read the Paragraph! :O Due later , Help Me!
    12·2 answers
  • Truth was a slave until 1827, and later that year, slavery ended in New York. How do you think she would have felt? Why do you t
    13·1 answer
  • Definition of Humanism
    7·1 answer
  • Which Europeans were the first to explore the lands of Arizona?
    11·1 answer
  • Liham pasasalamat para sa mga natatanging pilipinong nakipaglaban para sa kalayaan ng bayan
    8·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!