Answer:
a
Explanation:
jackson was the one a was the one who was when it happedned
Joseph Stalin was a strong, ambitious, brutal, and practical state-man, a man of action and politics. Stalin, born under the name of Iosif Vissarionovich Dzhugashvili, of Georgian and poor origin, was raised as a street boy by a drunken and violent father. He forged a strong character and a corpulent body, without a very persuasive speech, although a very clever mind. He was patient and reflexive, very smart for politics. Stalin wanted very well trained and disciplined revolutionary professionals, a body of bureaucrats for the Soviet Union.
Lev Trotsky was totally the opposite. Born under the name of Lev Davidovich Bronstein, son of wealthy landowner Jewish parents, he developed a distinguished and very well educated character, he was elegant, but also fanatic enough to lead the masses. Unlike Stalin, he was not only a politician but also a Marxist intellectual and was less methodic and patient than Stalin. Trotsky wanted a not very well organized party of masses and the triumph of the permanent revolution. He wanted to export the revolution worldwide and not keep it limited to one country only.
Vladimir Lenin, born under the name of Vladimir Ilich Ulianov, was in the middle between both characters. He was the basis of the Russian Revolution. He had brilliant political intelligence and ambition, and he was a Marxist intellectual as well. After his death in 1924, the movement was divided between Trotsky and Stalin, and finally, the Soviet Union was lead by Stalin who sent Trotsky to exile. Trotsky died in 1949, killed by spies sent by Stalin to Mexico, where Trotsky was exiled.
Crop yields increased in the decades after World War 2 despite the number of farms decreasing:
<em>A.The growth of bio-engineering proceeded new types of high-yield crops.</em>
1989 was a year when Poland finally became a democratic, independent country. Soviet communism has fallen thanks to the negotiations between the communists and their opposition in Poland. In effect it was possible to make the first free election of the president at the end of 1990 (Lech Walesa was elected). Workers had a free right to form unions, but in the following years their significance and effectiveness decreased.
Officially the situation hasn't changed up to date, but most Polish people know that in spite of changing the political system, most of the pre-1989 politics are still in power, but it's not official. However many of their decisions are clearly showing that there's no place for fair democracy in Poland.
The mongol interlude in russian history resulted in......
