Safety since of the poor conditions
<span>The public assistance program is authorized through:
d. the stafford act.</span>
Answer:
a. The Equal Protection Clause is a clause from the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The clause provides that "nor shall any State [...] deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws".
Its purpose is to apply substantially more constitutional restrictions against the states than had applied before the Civil War. Hence, in Shaw v. Reno, 509 U.S. 630 (1993), Supreme Court held that redistricting based on race must be held to a standard of strict scrutiny under the equal protection clause while bodies doing redistricting must be conscious of race to the extent that they must ensure compliance with the Voting Rights Act.
While in the case of Easley v. Cromartie, 532 U.S. 234 (2001), Supreme Court held that the State violated the Equal Protection Clause in drawing the 1997 boundaries was based on clearly erroneous findings.
b. In the case of Easley v. Cromartie, an appeal from the decision given in hunt v. Cromartie was filed in the supreme court of the United States by Easley. In hunt v. Cromartie, the court held that the legislature of North Carolina did not use the factor of race while drawing the boundaries in the twelfth congressional district,1992. It was held by the court that the legislature did not violate the equal protection clause of the constitution and no evidence to prove that legislature set its boundaries on a racial basis rather than a political basis.
In Easley v Cromartie the appeal was that drawing the boundaries for voting violated the equal protection clause of the constitution. The supreme court of the United States held that the decision of the district court is erroneous because it actually relied upon racial factors and this is not in the interest of the state.
In Shaw v. Reno the court concluded that the plan of North Carolina tried to segregate the voters on the basis of race.
<span>What is the significance of the dawn attack to militants / insurgents Indonesia / international is that the question?
</span>
<span>Top, diperkirakan telah mendalangi serangkaian serangan bom yang menewaskan ratusan orang sejak tahun 2002, telah menyatakan dirinya pemimpin al-Qaedas di Asia Tenggara.</span>
Answer:
A couple comprises of two people from different backgrounds and upbringing which have a connection and decide to stay together. Different conflicts may arise which may be due to financial constraint, emotional issues etc.
Step 1: The source of the conflict should be looked into so that it can be tackled effectively.
Step 2: It is always good to ignore the incident and not blow them out of proportion.
Step 3: It is good to seek for solutions from experts.
Step 4: It is good to know the suitable solutions both parties can adopt.
Step 5: Agreeing to end and forgive each other is also key too.
