1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
elena-14-01-66 [18.8K]
3 years ago
7

What are two ways the Bill of Rights opposes the idea of the divine right of kings?

History
2 answers:
satela [25.4K]3 years ago
7 0
1. Limiting They're Power 2. Held Against Putting they're people to slavery
Mars2501 [29]3 years ago
7 0

The English Bill of Rights opposed the idea that kings had divine right to rule by making them be subjected to other powers such as the Parliament, which limited their power. Also the Bill of Rights removed the king as the head of the Church making religion not a matter of politics.

Also the King did not have power to limit other people’s rights such as freedom of speech and be free from cruel and unusual punishment.

You might be interested in
What are the 3 most serious threats to a society's survival?
Margaret [11]

Answer:

no water

no food

no oxygen

Explanation:

I was gonna say someone but I must stay as a friendly neighbor

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which country was most concerned with Germany gaining too much power?
dangina [55]

Answer:

the American they didn't want them having to much power

8 0
3 years ago
What was revolutionary about Martin Luther and his beliefs?
jolli1 [7]

Answer:

The right answers are:

4. He believed that the Bible was the ultimate authority on Christianity, not the pope.

5. His theological stand against the Catholic Church began the Protestant Reformation.

Explanation:

For Luther, the doctrine of redemption and grace had been corrupted in the practices of the Roman Catholic Church. He stated that salvation and receiving God´s grace could be attained by the faith and that the Bible was the ultimate authority, not the pope or men´s interpretations.

8 0
3 years ago
The Monroe Doctrine was intended to guard what for the United States?
pickupchik [31]

Answer:

A.

Explanation:

The Monroe Doctrine was a policy framed by President James Monroe. The doctrine was issued in opposition to European colonialism in America. The doctrine was intended to guard the Western Hemisphere of the United States from European colonization.

After Spain and Portugal colonies in Latin America achieved independence, President Monroe issued this policy to stop European countries to further attempt to colonizing countries in the US.

Therefore, option A is correct.

5 0
3 years ago
How did European powers responded to Islamic expansion?
Ivan
European powers provided support both military and technological wise to countries that are fighting the Islamic expansion

hope this helps
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Suggest your own ideas for reconstruction and explain why they are good ideas
    12·1 answer
  • What was one of Japan's primary goals during World War I?
    15·2 answers
  • What did colonists say the king was unfit to be
    8·1 answer
  • Why are the women getting all prettied up? in iron jawed angels
    7·1 answer
  • Who did Harriet stand up for as a suffragist
    12·1 answer
  • Nepal has great possibility of hydropower generation ". justify this statement ​
    14·1 answer
  • 1.
    12·1 answer
  • Hello guys, i need urgent help. I will mark u brainliest just help me
    14·1 answer
  • Which health agency is under the supervision of the American federal government?
    8·1 answer
  • Which of the following is true of Carter's attempt to free the hostages in Iran?
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!